Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Fondurant

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep as redirect.—Silly Dan (talk) 21:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Fondurant (talk - history - links - logs)

Keep

Merge

Redirect

  1. \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 12:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  2. Nothing wrong with redirects from misspellings. —Silly Dan (talk) 12:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  3. Green Tentacle (Talk) 15:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  4. Riffsyphon1024 22:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  5. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 22:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  6. Redirect. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 19:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  7. Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 03:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  8. jSarek 20:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete

--Palpatine81 12:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

This article was created (see first edition) according to two reference links:

I search where the planet was mentioned and I haven´t found it in HT novel I or II. So it must be a typo like Fonfor instead or Fondor. It must be caused because Fondurant is a French location or by a mistake with Fodurant, mentioned in Hero´s Trial I.

\\Captain Kwenn// has redirected it to Fodurant, but I think it must be deleted.

  • It doesn't need to be deleted. If the CUSWE lists it as Fondurant, the redirect will help people who have followed that source - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 12:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Uh guys, this redirects already. Time to can the vote? -- Riffsyphon1024 03:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
    • I think so. I just don't want to do it because I'm lazy. -- Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 03:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
      • Ironically, I'm only closing it because I am lazy and not doing anything more productive. I am too lazy to put a VFD result notice on the talk page: there's no point to that when we're keeping it as a redirect to an article no one asked to delete. —Silly Dan (talk) 21:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)