Welcome, Colin1993!Hello, and welcome to Wookieepedia! I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! —DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:31, September 30, 2017 (UTC) |
Sourcing
Please stop adding unverified info to articles. --Rakhsh (talk) 07:53, September 30, 2017 (UTC)
- I haven't. The info i have added has largely been verified. --Colin1993 (User talk:Colin1993)
- Please make sure that when you add information to the page you also add the source as to where it comes from, if you have any questions on how to do this please take a look at Wookieepedia:Sourcing, see how its done on another article or just ask any user for help--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:31, September 30, 2017 (UTC)
.. like when you provided the non existant source that said coleman ckaj replaces adi gallia on the council? spare me.—Unsigned comment by Colin1993 (talk • contribs)
- No need for attitude. If the information is official, please provide a source for it via a reference. See the above page that DarthRuiz linked to more instructions on how to do that. MasterFred
(Whatever) 08:51, September 30, 2017 (UTC)
- the information i just made reference to is not official, has no source, and yet is still being peddled by one or two editors here. so you might want to stop being hypocritical here before telling others here to cite sources. just an idea, i know its a bit left field.—Unsigned comment by Colin1993 (talk • contribs)
- Hello there. Firstly, please heed what DarthRuiz30 has said above - whenever you add new information to an article, ensure it's referenced to an appropriate source. If you can't reference it at the moment or are not sure what source to use, take it to the article's talk page and discuss it with fellow editors. And secondly, don't ever forget to be civil. If you continue to be impolite to users like you were in the above comment, an administrator may choose to give you a cooldown period from editing to reconsider your attitude. Imperators II(Talk) 10:33, September 30, 2017 (UTC)
- the information i just made reference to is not official, has no source, and yet is still being peddled by one or two editors here. so you might want to stop being hypocritical here before telling others here to cite sources. just an idea, i know its a bit left field.—Unsigned comment by Colin1993 (talk • contribs)
Warning
Please do not falsify sources. Star Wars Rebels: Head to Head states Maketh Tua's height as 1.87. You changing that figure goes against our Sourcing and Attribution policies. If you continue to do this, you will be blocked. Thank you. Tommy 
Macaroni 11:01, April 9, 2020 (UTC)
Warning
Please stop changing the height value of the Adi Gallia article. We currently use the one provided by Star Wars: The Clone Wars: Character Encyclopedia - Join the Battle! as it is the most recent source to provide the value. If you continue to change the value despite the explanation given under the contradiction section, you will be blocked accordingly. Thank you for your understanding. Bonzane10 
12:29, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hey there. Thanks for reaching out! The point of the warning was not to be harsh but more of the fact that you've been around for a while and also that you've been warned by others previously of a similar issue. To put it simply, when a contradiction happens, we generally follow whichever source is the newest (unless it's a super obvious mistake or a case-by-case exception) and note the rest of the contradicting issues under their relevant section. In regards to other parts of your edits being reverted, I highly suggest putting down an edit summary going forward as it is the best way to communicate your reasoning when making a change, especially when it's a major paragraph restructuring. Bonzane10
17:20, 29 October 2025 (UTC)