Talk: CharlotteSmoothie

Welcome, CharlotteSmoothie!

Hello, CharlotteSmoothie, and welcome to Wookieepedia! We hope you like the place and choose to join us in building the best Star Wars encyclopedia there is. Here are some things you should know: Wookieepedia is the Star Wars encyclopedia that anyone can edit, but we are not a general Star Wars forum nor an all-inclusive trivia site. In-universe articles are written in past tense and from a neutral point of view. Our Manual of Style and Layout Guide form the basis for writing on Wookieepedia. All additions to Wookieepedia must be sourced and attributed to a reliable, official source. Fan fiction is welcome on the Star Wars Fanon Wiki. As a registered Wookieepedia user, you are entitled to a user page and a unique signature. Eventually you will also gain the right to vote on community matters. Remember to be nice to your fellow Wookieepedians. Avoid making personal attacks and engaging in edit wars. Using multiple accounts is not allowed. Talk pages and forums are part of the public record and comments on them, including your own user talk page, should be left intact. Remember to sign your comments by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~ New to wikis? Don't worry, we were all new once. Our help pages will get you started, and the Jundland Wastes sandbox can be used for test edits. Don't be afraid to make mistakes—be bold! I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, you can consult our FAQ, ask a question in the Senate Hall forum, visit our official IRC channel, or leave me a message on my talk page. May the Force be with you! —1358 (Talk) 19:54, December 18, 2018 (UTC)

The Lost Missions

Hi there!

I have reverted your edit once more, as the Clone Wars Legacy comes before Season 7.

--Tetsu Aero (talk) 19:42, June 16, 2019 (UTC)

But it doesn't season seven follows season six. legacy is just bonus material CharlotteSmoothie (talk) 23:55, November 24, 2019 (UTC)

That´s not how it works. Legacy is how the story continues between season 6 and 7. It doesn't matter if you consider it "bonus materials".--Tetsu Aero (talk) 18:19, December 4, 2019 (UTC)

TCW

Hi again!

Please refrain from reverting my edits again. As The Lost Mission was followed chronologically by Legacy, and Season 7 was chronologically preceded by Legacy. And this is all in the current canon. If you have a logical argument aginst this i would like to hear it--Tetsu Aero (talk) 20:10, April 22, 2020 (UTC)

Reply

Hi there. In response to your query on Ayrehead02's talk page, the image was deleted in line with our policies on deleting unused images. Following the vote to remove it as the main image, it became unused. Hope this clarifies it. Supreme Emperor ^Holocomm 03:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Crimson Reign edits

Hello CS. Just leaving you a message to let you know that all the edits made to the comics and crossover pages by me were to remove the presence of comic-issues that did not posses a Crimson Reign crossover title. I find it quite rude of you to completely undo a lot of work done by me to keep everything organized. You question the source of my changes. I suggest you actually read the sources then, as the comic-issues can clearly be shown whether or not they have the crossover title on both their wiki pages and/or their retail pages.--Neon Love (talk) 03:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

if there is the banner on it or not doesn't matter, it was stated before the event started that the whole acrs are part of it. i know it has to have been hard work, but it has to be undone anyways because it was wrong CharlotteSmoothie (talk) 16:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

I think it does matter, if they don't have the banner it's clear they aren't really part of the crossover, the WOTBH issues all do have the banner, which clearly means they are part of it Lewisr (talk) 16:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Also, please don't continue to edit-war with Neon Love until the issue has been resolved. Reverting edits mid-way in a dispute is not productive. I will give this same message to Neon Love as well. OOM 224 16:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Lewisr a banner doesn't make a crossover, the other issues were always included in the crossover in information given by official sources and are under the banner in the preview page back in the previous issues. they just do not have these on the cover which is just a design choice. CharlotteSmoothie (talk) 19:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Easily missed considering it's only at the end of comics that it was depicted with the banner, they were not 'random theories' as you suggest, but it's cleared up now Lewisr (talk) 21:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

I did, in fact, miss those back-of-comic advertisements. Thank you for bringing those to my attention, I admit that I was wrong. I suggest next time you argue with someone that you lead with your logic and reasoning, rather than holding it off and frustratingly prolonging the argument. I feel that my own reasonings were hardly "random theories" as they were all clearly laid out and understood by others, so please refrain from accusing myself and others so rudely in the future.--Neon Love (talk) 15:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

When an edit this big, against existing information, is made it should be sourced and not be just made up out of a stylistic choice on the cover. If there is no source or even a hit why these changes were made there is hardly anything to argue about beside undoing it for being untrue CharlotteSmoothie (talk) 04:05, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Warning

User warning: Three-Revert Rule. You have come close to violating, or have already violated, the Three-Revert Rule. If you continue to edit-war, an administrator will block you from editing. Please reconsider your approach, and pay attention to the advice others provide. DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Re: cinematography

Hello, sorry for the delayed response. The reason that I reverted your edit is because the infobox should be limited to the most important things - obviously cinematography is important, but once we start allowing things like that, it becomes a slippery slope for things that are important enough to be in the infobox, and it'll get way too big. Besides, it's covered in the credits section, so there's really no harm in it not being there. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 01:55, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Star Wars Resistance Animation

Hello! I'm DFaceG, one of the more active Resistance editors on the wiki. I just wanted to ask about your recent edits to Star Wars Resistance Animation. I left a message asking to resolve the recent edit dispute on the article's own talk page as well, but I thought I would directly contact you as well.

From what I'm gathering, you're adding the High Tower comic on the basis of association via series rather than a direct appearance in the Resistance Animation magazine. While the comic's relation can be noted elsewhere on the article if this is the case, it should not be listed as a part of Animation unless the comic makes an appearance in the magazine. I've refrained from reverting your most recent edit to wait for a response and further dialogue, but essentially it just boils down to whether or not it's actually part of the magazine. Being tangentially related is not enough to treat it as a fully-included section. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 22:43, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

• As an addendum, I have since removed it from the list of comics in the magazine given the evidence we have, I simply ask that you discuss it further on the talk page of the article (or our personal talk pages) before reverting again, that way we can prevent it from being edit warred. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 22:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Re: Madelin Sun

Hello there! Yes, I moved your deletion template as the page doesn't really qualify for a speedy deletion--it is contested, as shown on Talk:The Archivist, and the placement of that template breaks the redirect, which is the current function of that page. I reviewed Crimson Reign 5 and unless I'm mistaken, Qi'ra only refers to her as "Sava Sun," not Madelin Sun. Has she ever been addressed as Madelin or Madelin Sun in-universe or only in that issue solicitation? When she said "I have a name," she didn't share what that name was; I personally take that as her original name not being important enough to her to provide it or something she chose to conceal. Did something indicate she doesn't regard herself as The Archivist? Immi Thrax (she/her) 02:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

• ETA: I do see that in a Crimson Reign 3 flashback, Qi'ra addressed her as Madelin! Has that happened in a "present-day" story? Immi Thrax (she/her) 02:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Since talk pages often go unnoticed, I suggest presenting this on the Forum:Senate Hall for a more visible discussion (or on Forum:Consensus track for a vote—but I highly recommend the Senate Hall first and see if it's then necessary to go to a vote). How does that sound? Immi Thrax (she/her) 03:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
    • The reason I suggest the Senate Hall and possibly Consensus Track is so you can explain your reasoning to a larger audience and see if others support the move or not. The naming policy isn't very clear-cut on this case and at least one user disagrees with your proposed move, but other people don't know it has been discussed. Basically, it's not me you have to convince--it's the community. Immi Thrax (she/her) 03:42, 10 February 2023 (UTC)