Talk: Cal Jedi/Archive 5

< User talk:Cal Jedi

Hello!

Can you guess where my username comes from? NikanaStarkiller 00:48, April 3, 2012 (UTC)

Friend of the Wookieepedia

Hi, Cal. I have nominated the Star Wars PocketModel TCG official website to become friends with Wookieepedia, and I was wondering if you could vote in support of it. The SWPM site has been the official site for the game and still archives official images from the game even after its final distribution. Like the current Star Wars CCG site, these images are linked to articles on the Wookieepedia as references. The SWPM site's images, however, are not blocked by users that are not logged in or registered, such as the current arrange that exists on the SWCCGCC site, resulting in error messages/dead links. The SWPM game conceptualized many units not pictured or imaged elsewhere in the Star Wars universe, and has even created new squadrons, battle groups, vehicles and starships at the direction of George Lucas' notes to the designers. It would be great if you could vote in favor, so please consider it and thanks for your support in advance! —GethralkinHyperwave 13:56, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

  • Sure, I can quit asking for support of the nomination. I didn't know that it wasn't allowed. Thanks for letting me know so that I don't give the wrong impression. —GethralkinHyperwave 23:06, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

The thing with the questions

Hey, Cal. Thanks again for answering those questions about Good articles. They are now in a NewsNet post which is on the Main Page! Menkooroo 16:57, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

Re: False info

The Palaeontologist 03:43, April 14, 2012 (UTC)The PalaeontologistThe Palaeontologist 03:43, April 14, 2012 (UTC) Hello. I do not insert false information. I am a creator of my own wikia and a top ranked member of another. I have always liked Wookieepedia. But it is not yours, nor is it mine. I didn't see the need to edit here. Its in good hands. Mainly. But people write illogical points of bias. If you refer to the Marek VS Sidious edit half an hour ago, I did that, because it was wrongly stated that Sidious lost. This is incorrect. Marek himself told Kota he was more powerful than he knew. Sidious was not fighting at full strength. I kept in line with the logic and truth. Sidious himself said he COULD become his EQUAL. He was causing Marek great pain. He was not powerful enough to overcome Sidious at this time, and so when the rebels were in danger he gave himself to the force and the blast of energy killed the stormtroopers and knocked already injured Vader back. But Sidious just shielded himself, right in the face of the blast with little effort. I post with logic.

Razor hounds were beasts native to the planet Corellia. Baron Merillion Tarko pitted razor hounds against General Rahm Kota in the Tarko-se Arena in 1 BBY. As the only being opposing them in the arena, indeed their target, Rahm Kota must have killed them (as he did everything else sent at him including an Acklay) prior to Starkiller's timely arrival - as soon after, the Gorog was released on both of them. Starkiller fought this whilst Kota moved to apprehend or kill Merillion Tarko.

The Palaeontologist 04:47, April 14, 2012 (UTC)The Palaeontologist

How is that not logical and totally obvious? It is just some tiny thing and you are acting like a little tyrannical bully? It doesn't need showing. It is simple common sense. Kota killed everything including a stormtrooper wave (unseen) sent to kill him by Merillion. He was attacked but must have won, otherwise Starkiller would have found him dead. Its all on the Force Unleashed II gameplay and cinematics. In desperation, the Gorog was released. Even that perished. What does that say about the relatively puny razor hounds? It is so obvious they served the purpose of next course for Kota.

The Palaeontologist 05:00, April 14, 2012 (UTC)The Palaeontologist

Those were ridiculous ideas and actually, no, I wasn't 'attacking' you at all. You do not have to be so defensive. I was saying acting 'like' one. I don't make ill informed ideas of other people. Why would a sane person? I can tell you must feel mightly superior on this to me because of the edits. Trust me, that is nothing. Anyway, I wasn't attacking you at all and to be fair you are the one being hostile. I can't say any better than that. Lets agree to disagree. I don't like you, but I don't dislike you. I'm just indifferent. Btw, I am sure we could get on.

The Palaeontologist 05:11, April 14, 2012 (UTC)The Palaeontologist

This is pathetic. Honestly. You are several years younger than me for a start. I am a British Palaeontology student and Atheist. Clearly, I have been made to dislike you. Bullies shouldn't be allowed on here. That too personal Adolf?

Ming-di

I was pretty sure it was Chen in at least one entry, but I don't have the game on me at this time. Could you double-check the TFUII database? SinisterSamurai 05:10, April 15, 2012 (UTC)

Hay Cal, thank you for getting rid of that unknown user's not very nice comment on my talk page. Always nice to know that someones looking out for the little guy. Anyway thanks. --Darthahsokaboyfrenidfett 04:55, April 18, 2012 (UTC)

Undo

Just curious as to why you undid my edit, despite the fact it is only one item, it still gives the infobox a more organized appearence.--Supreme Emperor 03:03, April 19, 2012 (UTC)


Understood, but wouldn't it give the infobox a more organized and symmetrical appearence?--Supreme Emperor 03:30, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Re Stubs

Ok. I will keep that in mind for futur referance.--Great Krayt Dragon 01:59, April 20, 2012 (UTC)

Sig

Hi, sorry to bother you but when I went to enter the following singnaturePentastar patrol501st dogma(talk) into "preferences", it would not allow it and said Invalid raw signature. Check HTML tags, Is that because of the pic in front, or is it something else? Thanks, 501st DogmaRepublic emblem(Comlink) 20:55, April 26, 2012 (UTC)

  • Thanks for that. Pentastar patrol 501st dogma(talk) 21:14, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
    • Sorry to bother you again, but when ever I use my signature it shows the picPentastar patrol on the recent changes page, even though the picture is at 10 px. Is there any way to stop that? Thanks, Pentastar patrol 501st dogma(talk) 20:34, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
      • Yes, if you look at the recent changes now you should see the pic. Pentastar patrol 501st dogma(talk) 23:45, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
        • Wiki skin. Other users pics don't show up here but mine does. Pentastar patrol 501st dogma(talk) 23:50, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
          • That makes sense, I was thinking of changing to monobook anyways due to how Wikia broke the redirects. Pentastar patrol 501st dogma(talk) 00:12, April 28, 2012 (UTC)

Lego Star Wars stop motion videos Hi! I have a new account on Youtube and I was wondering if you'd like to take a look at it if you have the time! My channel name is LJ1138. Please comment if you like what you see!--71.212.202.133 17:27, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

Re: First GA

Thanks! I'm really excited and hope to be working on another one soon.- Princess GLG 11:32, May 11, 2012 (UTC)

RE: IN-GA 44 GAN

Hi, sorry to bother you, but it's been two weeks since you made your objections to the GAN I started. I think I've addressed your problems, could you check it out and update your vote? thanks, <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 17:25, May 14, 2012 (UTC)

  • Hate to bother you again, but I've finished all the edits to the article. Could you look at it and see if I've addressed it to your satisfaction? <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 00:28, May 30, 2012 (UTC)

Halle Dray

Hi Cal, just wondering if i'm going to nominate Halle Dray, should it be nominated as a good artical or a comprehensive artical..?--Cumulonimbus Cloud 13:55, May 15, 2012 (UTC)

Hi again Cal, i've finished my edits on Halle Dray, read through what a good artical should have and I think it's all set, and i'm here to ask you if you think it's good enough to be a good artical, do you have any suggestions for improvements? --Cumulonimbus Cloud 00:55, May 17, 2012 (UTC)
Nominated the artical on GAN. Cumulonimbus Cloud 21:46, May 19, 2012 (UTC)

Comet

Could you archive Comet on the GAN page, as I intend to move him to the FAN page. Thanks, 501st dogma(talk) 20:03, May 16, 2012 (UTC)

  • Thanks, now on the the FAN page after a copyedit or two. 501st dogma(talk) 21:31, May 16, 2012 (UTC)
    • Monobook seems so weird. Everything is in a different place! I'll continue trying to use monobook, though it will take me a while to get used to it. 501st dogma(talk) 21:32, May 16, 2012 (UTC)

tc

Hey, Cal,

Due to some evidence of official recognition brought forth about the Polish street, I've amended Forum:TC:Star Wars streets to only be about the Vegas streets. Just letting everyone who's voted know. Menkooroo 01:00, May 24, 2012 (UTC)

Barn-burner 4

I would just like to thank you for your participation in the barn-burner. So far only three article have been nominated, but we have ten more being nominated. If you have time, please stop over at the review pages and give the barn-burner articles a review. Since some people wanted the barn-burner to be in June, I was thinking that we should extend it through June to catch more nominations. If you have any comments please reply on the Barn-burner page. Thank you for your participation!--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 12:33, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

Whoops!

Thanks for correcting my mistake on the nom page, Cal, heh heh, feel like such a dummy.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 01:28, May 29, 2012 (UTC)

Rollback

Congrats on getting rollback, Cal! :) You should now see a rollback link that looks like [rollback] on diffs, histories, recent changes and your watchlist, so feel free to start using it on inappropriate edits. Cheers, grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 00:04, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

"Inuse"?

Hey man, what do you have against me? I don't the problem with whatever I did "wrong". And if you don't want anybody editing it, lock it down. Simple. And one more thing, you haven't changed my edit... :) --Darth R2-D2, Dark Lord of the Droids 00:37, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

consensus track

Thanks for the correction on the Consensus Track Entry I made. I have revised it. I think I did I've done it correctly now.
—Eшσҡ $їтӈ Lōяƌ 02:27, June 4, 2012 (UTC)

Palejo Reshad

Hello Cal, if you give prenoms, can you give Palejo Reshad a review? Just to let you know, however, I won't actually nominate him until Menkooroo looks for him in the various adaptations and other sources where he could potentially be pictured. Hanzo Hasashi 14:48, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

Good articles

I noticed that you're on the AgriCorps and stuff. I was wondering what kind of things you guys look for in an article. Like, in the Timeline of Books article, what criticisms would you have? If I understand how your standards work, I might be able to create better articles.
—Eшσҡ $їтӈ Lōяƌ 19:13, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

Droid Barn-Burner extension

Hk47portrait

Hello, <insert name here>, this is Exiled Jedi, and I am here to tell you that barn-burner 4 has been extended into June. We have currently passed three comprehensive articles, and have four featured article nominations and eight good article nominations. So if you have the time, stop by and review some of the articles for the barn-burner. Also, it would be great if each of the barn-burner contributors could do one more nomination each, so that we could have a good turn-out! Have a nice day, and happy editing!--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 13:49, June 7, 2012 (UTC)

Re: AC meeting

Sure thing. I'm trying to get on, but I just got a new computer so I have to set up chatzilla all over again. :P Hopefully I'll be on soon. Thanks for waiting. CC7567 (talk) 20:08, June 9, 2012 (UTC)

  • Haha, sorry :P CC7567 (talk) 00:21, June 11, 2012 (UTC)
    • Ugh, forgot about that. Thanks for reminding me. CC7567 (talk) 00:25, June 11, 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified assistant manager

I don't really care enough to revert it, but please refrain from adding ref notes to articles that passed the nomination process, don't require them, and weren't intended to have them. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 03:31, June 26, 2012 (UTC)

  • Never mind, I am reverting it. I'm still thinking like I have dial-up and it would take me a few minutes. XD NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 03:33, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
    • Ref notes are not required on articles from a single source and I do not like having them on these kinds of articles, so I do not. Having them adds nothing to the quality of the article, it is a personal choice. Use them on your own single-source articles. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 03:37, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
    • "While they are not required." If you would not be allowed to bring it up during the nomination process, do not try to sneak it in after against my wishes. As the author, I don't want them and they are staying off. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 03:44, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm not posting here to take anyone's side, but rather to point out that both of you have violated, or come close to violating, the Three-revert rule. Probably best if you both refrain from touching the article while you hash this out. Menkooroo 03:52, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
    • Edit: Clarifying that "come close to" is correct. Apparently it's actually a four-revert rule. :P Apologies if it seemed like I was accusing either of you of something. Menkooroo 03:57, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
  • (Edit conflict (Twice. :P)) I did not say I own them, but it is a courtesy to respect the author's wishes with any status article as the author assumes responibility as its caretaker. It has always been so. Further, I'm not implying, I'm saying you're doing it underhandedly. You, yourself, signed off on that article and if you had brought up adding refs then, you would have gotten the same answer you're getting now: you are not allowed to object to that. I respect your desire to add to articles, but your notion that these refs are additive does not change the rule that you quoted, which clearly states they are not required. This is up to me, as author. I don't want them because I feel they add nothing and they are staying off. As it sits, we're on the cusp of violating 3RR. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 04:00, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
    • The underhandedness comes not from how long ago it was, but from the disregard of part of the rule you quoted in favor of the part you support. In doing so and not consulting the author's caretaker first. It reeks of trying to slip in under the radar as I'm well documented as feeling strongly on this, though I don't blame you if you didn't know that beforehand. Go ahead and contact an administrator about it. He or she will say we're being ridiculous. And, you know what? They'd be right. But what will not change is that I wrote the thing and, when something is not required, it is my call on whether or not it is included. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 04:16, June 26, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Bandon CAN objection

Struck the objection. I must have forgoton to do that a while ago. Thanks for pointing that out. 501st dogma(talk) 20:44, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Userboxes

How do you get all of those boxes with the random things on them under your username? I think that it is really funny!````

Okay... Frak it. Can you tell me how to get the images on there? Which code am I supposed to use? (Check my userpage for a idea of what I am trying) --Aryn Tarra (talk) 20:26, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Okay... that's it. I have been online all afternoon trying to figure out how you set up one of those infoboxes. I have GOT to be screwing up something. Can you go to my userpage and figure it out? My bedroom's a MESS now! :D Thanks so much... if you don't have time just tell me how to set it up. And also- I figured out the Aurebesh! Hey, if you look on my talk page, you will see that I am in the process of figuring out how to mark a fanon's page with something that looks a little nicer and more warming than this. {{user fanon}} Any ideas? --Aryn Tarra (talk) 18:45, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

Yes- The infobox didn't appear correctly. Maybe I am messing something up?--Aryn Tarra (talk) 19:37, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

WP:VG one year anniversary

1313RakJaren-SWcom
WookieeProject Video Games has completed its first year!
A year ago today, WookieeProject Video Games was founded. Although it started out rather small, it quickly grew to be currently one of the most productive WookieeProjects. In that year, WookieeProject Video Games has seen seven Featured articles, thirty-four Good articles, and sixty-five Comprehensive articles passed, a very impressive amount especially for such a short time.


WP:VG was founded by Cal Jedi on July 8, 2011 with a mission "to improve...video game articles and bring them up to date" and also to "bring all related articles to Featured article status, Good article status, and Comprehensive article status." WP:VG has answered the call to the best of its ability. Five days after its formation, Exiledjedi joined the Project. More and more users began joining, until now, the project has eleven members. On July 26, 2011, the Project gained its first Comprehensive article, Unidentified Bakuran astromech droid, taken to status by Cal Jedi. Shortly thereafter, WP:VG's first Good article, J'Meeb Gumb, was taken to status by Exiledjedi on August 17, 2011. WP:VG's first Featured article, Battle of Kessel (0 ABY), was brought to status on October 19, 2011 by a guest nominator, Kilson.


WP:VG has associated with many other WookieeProjects—such as WookieeProject The Old Republic, WookieeProject Knights of the Old Republic, WookieeProject Galaxies, and others—helping each other bring articles to status. Overall, Wookieepedia's video game articles have drastically improved. While many have been taken to status, many more have been worked on and improved through the efforts of WP:VG's members.


There are many Star Wars video games. From the very first Star Wars game, Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back, to the recently released Kinect Star Wars, WP:VG has been there to work on an area on Wookieepedia that needs much attention. With the many games that have been produced under the Star Wars title, a large amount of people have come to love Star Wars games. We have had some tremendous Star Wars games in the past, and as we look to the future, we can see many more promising Star Wars titles on the horizon. Star Wars: 1313 is just around the corner, and it will require much work. And that is not the end. There will be more Star Wars games in the future. WP:VG needs to be there to address their needs on Wookieepedia.


However, a WookieeProject is nothing without its members. An impressive amount of work has been done by Corellian Premier. He has done a lot of work taking care of the little details in video game articles—many of which would otherwise have been forgotten—and he has also done a fine job of doing a lot of "inside work" of WP:VG. Olioster has also been doing a tremendous job of late. He has recently nominated an impressive amount of articles from Star Wars Galaxies. Even though the game has been offline for quite some time now, he keeps carrying on in his work. Congratulations, though, go to all of WP:VG's members. Without the members, WP:VG would be nothing. Together, the members of WP:VG have done a wondeful work on Wookieepedia. WookieeProject Video Games has done a great job over the past year. May it continue to do even better in the years to come. May the Force be with the gamers!

—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 01:22, July 8, 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for the award, Cal, it has been a pleasure to help you with the project. I hope the project can be just as successful in its second year!--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 01:43, July 8, 2012 (UTC)

CA Review page

Could you take a look at Wertram Garran on the CA Review page?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 13:21, July 13, 2012 (UTC)

CT amendment

This is to inform you that a small amendment has been made to Forum:CT:Subcategorization and MW 1.19. The reasons for the amendment are laid out there. Please review it and make sure that you are still in support. Thanks. —MJ— War Room Friday, July 13, 2012, 14:22 UTC

Nebula

FA-Icon
"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!"
Battle near the Itani Nebula has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Menkooroo (talk) 01:45, July 23, 2012 (UTC)


Great work, Cal. So that's the end of your TFU project? I guess you'll have to find another wellspring of FAN ideas! ;) Menkooroo (talk) 01:45, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Thull Yularen

It's good to be back, but unfortunately this nom will probably be my only activity on the GAN page for a while. Still looking forward to the day when I'll be able to devote enough time to go back to reviewing though. Send my regards to the rest of the gang. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 17:06, July 25, 2012 (UTC)

Mistake!!

Hello, there! I made a mistake a few days ago... I was curious about what would happen if you edit an Wookieepedia article, without knowing that once you press the "Save Page" button it would be made public.

This was the article I'm talking about: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Meetra_Surik

And this is the modified article that remained in the revision history: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Meetra_Surik?oldid=4109423

Like I said, I didn't know what will happen and I only just replaced Meetra Surik's name from under the Photo with one of my KOTORTSL character's name:D

I feel a little uncomfortable for exposing one of my chars in the Revision Histoy, so I was wondering, if you can just erase it from the History, as long as it is only a minor "aberration"... Thank You, in advance!--Skyrunner27 (talk) 21:56, August 1, 2012 (UTC)