Talk: Natasi Daala

Back to page
Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Natasi Daala."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

FA-Former

Natasi Daala is a former Featured article. Please see this article's entry on the Inquisitorius page for the reasons it was removed.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
July 5, 2006 Featured article nomination Success
July 15, 2006 Featured article
January 13, 2008 Featured article review Removed
February 24, 2008 Former Featured article
June 15, 2008 Featured article nomination Failure
September 18, 2008 Failed Featured article nominee
Current status: Former Featured article
ImperiusUnitadaoberTotallex

"We do not require glory, only status articles for our Emperor."

Natasi Daala is within the scope of WookieeProject Ambition, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles relating to the Galactic Empire.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can find out more about our mission, or even join yourself!

Small image

The small image from the cover is stretching out a bit. Can anyone find a higher res version? Otherwise, would could go with this image from starwars.com. --SparqMan 16:50, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

RE:Image

I agree the image is a bit stretched, but I think its the best picture of her, that pic you suggested doesnt really capture the character the way the one from the cover does. I will look for a higher resolution version and change it, or if anyone else finds one then they can do so

I agree too we should change with a pic with better definition. Darth Judicar 1998 Feb.17 2009

Changed

Image has been changed, same pic without the stretch :D

Title

Should we slot Daala after Carivus (as final leader of the Empire) as the first leader of the Imperial Remnant? Or was she just the "uber-warlord" and was Pellaeon really the first? Thanos6 07:04, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Quote

Where is that quote from? 207.200.116.202 01:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

  • It's a good quote. Hopefully it came from a good source, which I'm sure it did. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 01:15, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • It's from Darksaber. I mostly have two problems with it though: One, Daala asserts that she was competent, and I assert that she was anything but. Second: The image of Grand Moff Tarkin having sexual relations...well, you get the idea. -- SFH 01:32, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Better with Daala than with Lady Tarkin. Actually, if memory serves, the next thing Daala says after the quote in Darksaber was, "But in this case it's true." Kuralyov 01:44, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
      • Thank you. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 01:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
      • I remember reading an essay on Domus Publica which basically laid out persons and experiences that refute some of Daala's beliefs about male dominance and discrimination within the Empire [1] Might find some new article-material there. He's meticulous! :o VT-16 13:41, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
        • Not quite my take on it. It seems more like he's saying that it did happen frequently, just not as frequently as the Alliance said. Further, it seems to justify Daala's position as she was extremely discriminated against due to her gender. Am I reading you guys right, though, or am I wrong, but are you guys uncomfortable about the first quote in the article?--SOCL 15:30, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
        • Not on my part, I just had the impression Daala victimized herself somewhat and treated her situation almost as unique. Also note, like the article pointed out, that the head of state after Palpatine, was Isanne Isard, a Galactic Empress. VT-16 17:25, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
          • Duly noted. However one Galactic Empress out of more than half a dozen Galactic Emperors isn't quite what I would call fair. Isard is not proof of pattern, but an exception.--SOCL 17:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
            • Somewhat true, and also a possibility that Daala (being posted out in the Maw Installation since long before the battle of Yavin, until a year after Operation Shadow Hand) went through training in a different time than most of the other female Imperials, seeing a different environment. Even so, other women went through training and ended up captaining fleets (Captain Plikk, who had lead a fleet for many years before 3 ABY, Admiral Oxtroe, who tried to sue for peace with the NR before being murdered on order of Palpatine etc), while Daala failed and got a title with help from Tarkin... -__- VT-16 19:05, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Ironically, Daala DID gain her position due to her affair with Tarkin. She was a Corporal, an ARMY rank, who worked in the kitchen of a Star Destroyer. After she was "discovered" by Tarkin, and following (and during) their affair, he gave her many "in house" promotions in a branch of the military she wasn't even a part of (again, she was Army, not Navy) until she had "gained" the rank of Admiral. Her Navy ranks would have no standing at all outside of Tarkin's jurisdiction, and would have been voided after his death. Her rank of "fleet admiral" after his death was technically illegal because, as far as the proper military was concerned, she was a corporal in the Army. Regardless of how deserving she was of of some sort of rank, she DID NOT gain it legitimately.

And that's what the quote at the top is incredibly ironic. ;~p--Jerry 19:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

    • Granted, her affair with Tarkin did push her through the ranks, but the way things have come across it seems that she wouldn't have been promoted for her competence. In other words, though it certainly had something to do with her affair, Tarkin promoted her more than likely based on her competence and not solely her sex appeal, promoting where discrimination would have left her as a no body.--SOCL 20:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
      • Wait a minute, how do we know for sure that someone can't switch from the Army to the Navy? When you think about it, if she was a corporal and she decided to be in the Navy, couldn't she have gotten the Navy equivalent to corporal and then be legally promoted? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 21:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
        • Well, I'm not sure about the Star Wars universe, though I'm sure it applies there, too, but one CAN switch branches in the real-world Armed Forces (at least the USA). My father served in the Marine Corps, Navy, and Army, and never left the service, so...--SOCL 02:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Time with Liegeus Vorn?

  • Planet of Twlight stated that Daala left Vorn about 20 years before (7-8 BBY). The book implied that was before she went to the Academy. Where does the statement about Daala being involved with Tarkin and Vorn at the same time come from? -Finlayson 19:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Got Her!

Here we go. The evidence that Daala was not a legitimate Admiral in the Imperial Navy. According to The New Essential Guide to Characters; Daala's alleged rank of Fleet Admiral was "an unofficial promotion outside of Coruscant's naval hierarchy, but a legitimate one among Tarkin's forces in the Outer Rim." As far as the Empire and Navy were concerned, Daala was still a Corporal in the Army (or Marines) who failed to graduate from the Academy and had never been a commissioned officer in the Imperial Navy. Only in Tarkin's Oversector Outer was her commission recognized. Once the Empire collapsed after Endor, there was no Oversector Outer to speak of so her commission would be rendered null and void as far as the legitimate Imperial State was concerned (indeed the Ruling Council had nothing to rule at the time of her return anyways, and was disbanded shortly after Xandel Carivus' death). Her rank of Fleet Admiral at the time of her return was no more legitimate than "Prince-Admiral" Krennel, or "Superior General" Delvardus and the other self-styled warlords with their made up ranks.--Jerry 19:36, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

  • So, she was a Corporal while she was in the role of an Admiral. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 22:53, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
    • As far as the Imperial Military was concerned, she was always a Corporal, never commissioned or even enlited in the Navy. It seems Tarkin quietly advanced her in his jurisdiction as is his right as the Commander in Chief of his territory, but if Daala had ever left Tarkin's spere of influence she would have had no rank to stand on; unless of course she was speaking to a Army private ;~). As soon Tarkin died (or at most upon the dissolution of Oversector Outer) her commission and rank would be rendered null and void. At the time she returned to the Empire, she was a Fleet Admiral in the same way Delak Krennel was a Prince-Admiral. To put it bluntly, she was a fraud.--Jerry 02:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
      • That's why I said "in the role of an Admiral". Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 20:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
        • Of course. Sorry, I wasn't trying to sound preachy or anything, but I tend to go off on my rants quite easily. Indeed, you understood my point perfectly. :-)--Jerry 21:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
        • Now, though, I feel I must make the bold statement that this article is not NPOV figuring heavily on what Daala percieved, rather than what actual events were.--Jerry 21:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
      • I made a few changes. Constructive criticism is welcome.--Jerry 23:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Insignia

Has anyone noticed Daala's rank insignia? Jedi Wolf 1:42, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I wonder what's up with that. I thought she claimed herself as an Admiral. Jedi Wolf 6:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Probably the artists' faults. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 23:13, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Perhaps requisitioning a new set of Admiral rank badges without proper paperwork would have raised too many flags, so Tarkin just gave her one of his Moff badges. This is all rampant speculation of the worst kind, of course. -Dangerdan97 06:06, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Name

Is "Daala" a family name or a Christian name? As they use it in the books, it sounds like it's the latter, but then you don't call your commanding officer by first name, do you? Evir Daal 12:29, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

  • It'd be family name, hence Admiral Daala. Green Tentacle (Talk) 12:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Not necessarily. We don't know if Palpatine is a first or last name. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 19:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
      • True, but kings and emperors are often known by their first name, military personnel aren't (you're Admiral Nebulax, not Admiral Jack). Then again, I've looked in Planet of Twilight and Liegeus Vorn also calls her Daala, and it would be kinda weired to call your ex by her surname. Maybe she's only got one name. Green Tentacle (Talk) 15:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Hair

Is it my imagination, or is her hair a different color in every single one of these pictures?Darth Ceratis 02:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Rank

Anybody who hasn't seen it yet might like to take a look at Forum:Admiral Daala - need citation. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:38, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Enlistment?

The first few lines of the article claim Daala enlisted in the Navy. There is a important distinction between someone who enlists in service and someone who enters, specifically as an officer. As far as I'm aware, no sources state that Daala at any point was an enlisted-person in the Navy. I am interested as to the source of this claim. Otherwise, I believe it should be changed as we only know she was an officer. Without confirmation of her either entering enlisted or commissioning directly as an officer, any such line should be stricken and should read something along the lines of "was an officer in the service of the Imperial Navy."--SOCLcomm 16:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Yeah, that's been bugging me for a while too.Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:14, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm going to go ahead and edit it out—better to be correct, but missing a little info than have incorrect information. If someone comes forward with a source, they're more than welcome to repost the claim.--SOCLcomm 20:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Amended: There seem to be persistent claims throughout the article that she enlisted in the Imperial military, and not just that, but went on to be an NCO in the Imperial Army! What sources exist for this? I don't want to change an article too much since it seems at least someone is convinced it happened, but there doesn't seem to be an available sources to back the claim. I'll just wait a bit before editing, unless someone else feels compelled to do so.--SOCLcomm 20:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
      • Amended...again: I somehow missed the bit in the above discussion by Jerry citing The Essential Guide to Characters as the source of the enlistment in the Imperial Army as a corporal working in the mess of a Star Destroyer. I somehow missed that in passing.--SOCLcomm 23:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
          • The information in the Essential Guide and the New Essential Guide to Characters must be differnt. The New Guide focuses on Daala's life as an admiral and says little about her life before enlistment, if that's what she did.User:SithGirl132
            • Actually, I think Darksaber mentions it, too. If I remember correctly, she mentioned it to Pellaeon following her threat to self-destruct her vessel, taking Harrsk with it.--SOCLcomm 19:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Sourcing?

What exactly needs to be sourced or referenced? The box has been there asking for sourcing for a few weeks. What exactly needs to be done?SithGirl132 18:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Question

Hello guys, I have got a question. Is there an article about Daala's campaign or an article where you can read about it a more precizly way as in the article about Daala? We the jedipedia from Germany are writing about her first campaign and have not found one, so I hope you can help me by giving me a link to the article. I'm looking forward to your answer. Best regards Boba 15:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

I found an article called Imperial Reunification is Daala's Reforms about her campaign or am I wrong? Boba 15:54, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't think we have an article about her campaign, other than what's written in the article here and the battle articles themselves. Kuralyov 16:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Allright. Thank you very much. Then we will make weblinks to the articles. Boba 16:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Contradiction

As I'm going to be working on this soon, I would like to clear one thing up. In the Jedi Academy trilogy Daala mentions that Palpatine did not know about the Maw installation. However, in Death Star, Tarkin says that he does know. I'm going to say that Tarkin knew Palpatine knew about the Maw, but Daala did not. That way, it's possible to make it so there's no contradiction. If anyone has a better idea, please share them. Chack Jadson (Talk) 23:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Didn't Death Star have Daala being injured and losing some of her memory and smarts? I thought that explained why she performed so poorly in the JAT. VT-16 22:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
    • I always thought she did so bad because her tactics were outdated, and she was, simply put, a loose cannon. Much of her strategy came from Tarkin, and that stuff was undoubtedly old by the time she left the Maw. Chack Jadson (Talk) 02:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
    • While that may be true, the authors of DS, put in a sequence where Daala gets some kind of brain damage during a battle, which is said to impair some of her thinking. VT-16 08:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
      • That makes sense though, that she suffered due to memory loss. Chack Jadson (Talk) 21:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Daala as COS of the Galactic Alliance

So, war criminal Daala, the hunted Imperial rogue, becomes CHIEF OF STATE OF THE GALACTIC ALLIANCE. The same Galactic Alliance that followed the New Republic that battled and hunted her for years? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA VT-16 01:20, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

  • ???! -- SFH 01:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  • WTF, For god sake's she's a relic from thirty years age using ships even older. Maw Installation must have created one powerful Mind Control Device for that to happen. QX100 02:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Perhaps it is because of her strength of will, added with her proven leadership abilities (from her years in exile), that make her the top candidate as the galaxy needs a strong and proven leader to stabilize itself.Ryan Fett (For Mandalore!)JaingHead 23:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

At any rate, the intro of the article would have to be changed. Unidentified Flying Bunny in the Sky Talk Contribs 04:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Behind the scenes anecdotal evidence

At the end of this section, their is mention of the fans' response to to Daala as Chief of State. The cited source for this information is the TFN discussion boards. This is not a reliable source that speaks for all the fans reactions to this development.

At best, one could say that "some people who post on the TFN discussion boards did not like this development"--or something to that effect.

It is anecdotal evidence and biased.

This presents a serious threat to the integrity and reliability of Wookieepedia as a reliable source of information.

It should be removed.

I attempted to once. It was changed back, and I was told not to delete the section again: "The info you deleted is comes from a verified source, and is needed fan reaction to the article, so don't delete it again."

This is just sloppy and irresponsible work.

Fact and events should be presented with GOOD verifiable sources. If opinions are utilized then both sides of the issue should be presented.

Just because something is cited does not means it is a good or reliable source of information.

  • I personally think its reliable enough. The statement is about fan's reactions, and it is referenced by a site that shows has posts of fan's opinions. The article never says all fans didn't like it - just some. And its definitely true that some fans don't like it. And its referenced accordingly. Also, please sign your comments with four tildes (these ~) Aqua Unasi 19:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
    • Yes, I noticed that you had deleted it at first, and yes, I am the one who told you not to revert it again. Discussion forums are more than reliable sources to display fan reactions, and the fact that people didn't like Daala's election as Chief of State is needed in the article for the BTS. DC 19:14, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
    • It is an empirical fact that some people dislike this plot element. It is our job to report these facts. Deal with it. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 19:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
      • More (non-TFN) citations wouldn't hurt, though, and they'd be easy to find. Amazon.com reviews, other fan reviews, NJOE, probably TOS blogs and threads, even SDN, Waru help us. Yrfeloran 19:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Fact vs. Opinion

I agree it's a fact that some people disliked it. But many also had no problem with it. Many even liked it.

It's implied, however, that most fan, at least, did not like this, which is, again, misrepresentation.

Telling me to "deal with it" doesn't change this other bit of information that was neglected.

If you want to say some people do not like it, then entries should be specific, and assertions should be more precise, particularly when it comes to subjective opinions

I say this b/c I really like Wookieepedia, and I care. I don't want it to be turned into a collection of vocal minority fan opinions.

  • sign your posts Steves490 19:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
    • my bad --Stymie 19:57, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
      • If you can give me evidence that some people didn't mind Daala becoming COS, then feel free to add/delete/do whatever. DC 20:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
        • And by the way, I want a link to the source, and it has to be a reliable discussion forum. DC 20:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
      • Yes, please show us a few posts where people show an equivalent level of positive reaction. I'd be pleasantly surprised to see some. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 20:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
        • The very same thread from TFN used for "evidence," which, by the way, was intentionally created to bring in like-minded people who did not like this turn of events, had many posts from others who both defended and liked the decision. But a bigger point to me seems to be that fan opinion of story content should not be in an encyclopedia entry, online or otherwise. There will always be someone who criticizes a story for some reason, in any genre. Maybe a new section should be added solely for "fan discussion board opinion." If not, then other entries should have similar information, such as the death of Anakin Solo or reaction to Vergere, to name a couple--Stymie 20:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
          • For major characters/events/organizations, having a BtS that contains sourced statements about overall fan reactions is a good thing. Coming onto talk pages to decry such a move, without presenting a really good argument (with links) against doing so, is not widely considered a good thing. If I were you, I would take the hint. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 20:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
            • [Redacted by administration] DC 20:47, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
              • Please keep discussions on talk pages civil and refrain from needless invective. Thank you. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 20:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
  • "which, by the way, was intentionally created to bring in like-minded people who did not like this turn of events" — you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. I'm the one who suggested it be added; I've never read LotF or much KJA, so I really don't care, though, if anything, I'm more amused than angered about it. I've no idea what the opinions of the user who added it are, though he definitely did not add it to bring in like-minded people; he added it because he wanted to satisfy my objection on the FAN page. So get a clue before you start accusing Wook editors of having clandestine motives. The last person who did that was mistaken, and you are too in this case. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
    • Wow. I do regret I just changed something without consulting first (in my defense, lame as it may be, it was my first time). But I didn't know expressing dissenting viewpoints is considered "whiny." As DC has demonstrated, I am clearly dealing with mature professionals here. I think it's best to just nip this in the bud and cut strings from here.--Stymie 21:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
    • I apologize for any hard feelings, and I have asked DC to refrain from further such posts in IRC. However, this is something that was well-thought out and has precedent, so the article content should stay. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 21:09, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
      • Yes, I do apologize if I was a bit harsh to you; you are new here as you said. Ataru was right to warn me, however, you should consult people on the article's talk page before deleting an important piece of info. DC 21:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

I disagree with the notion that the TFN forums represent a majority of readers. I also disagree with using a forum topic to represent a majority opinion of something, but that's just me. I think it would serve the purposes of this article better if we sourced a Poll instead. Shaoken 23:25, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Renatasia

Was the fact that she's from the Renatasia system removed for a reason? Thanos6 03:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Tarkin/Nelson and Daala/Emma Hamilton

Is it possible that the relationship between Tarkin and Daala is based apon the relationship between Vice Admiral Nelson and his mistress Emma Hamilton?

--Thrawn Du Gard 16:04, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Eye

On the back of Fate of the Jedi: Backlash,she has both eyes perfectly with no eye patch.That means she would have a prosthetic eye.--Sean Red 23:51, November 17, 2009 (UTC)

  • Hmm, interesting. Chack Jadson (Talk) 13:31, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
    • And that new picture of her crossing her arms that we have as the new main pic has her with both eyes too! Did she get a new eye or do all the artists just keep forgetting she has an eye patch? (Which is understandable being its never really brought up in the books anymore. I think they only meantioned her having a patch once in Fate of the Jedi: Apocalypse)--Jet Twilights (talk) 20:11, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

Alderaan?

I remember reading in one of the recent books that she lost a great deal of respect for Grand Moff Tarkin after learning of his role in the destruction of Alderaan, this true?

Eras

We have Daala as being in the Rise of the Empire era onward. While true, I want to point out that she doesn't appear in any sources in the Rebellion Era (she's in Death Star, Rise of the Empire era, and again in the Jedi Academy Trilogy. She was hiding throughout that era. And while she is in Star Wars: Rebellion, the game plot itself isn't canon (since it's a build-your-own-Empire game and has no specific, canon story, to my knowledge). So should we remove the Rebellion Era tag? Taral, Dark Lord of the Sith -Just shy, not antisocial: You can talk to me!- 19:35, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

Picture

Has anybody considered updating Daala's main picture to the one that appears on the back of the novel Backlash? Just wonderingKellymarieskywalker 19:39, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Admiral Daala Quote Page

I was just wondering if Natasi Daala had her own quote page,as I was considering creating one.I couldn't find a link at the bottom of her article and I searched Quote:Natasi Daala.I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something because I don't want to make an article that already exists!If nothing comes up,I will probobly start it in a couple days.Thanks! Kellymarieskywalker 15:39, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Dates for Daala

Does anybody have any idea:

1) What year Daala was born in (?? BBY), and 2) What year(s) she attended the Imperial Academy?

I've been trying to discover this for some time; I don't even know the Academy's age requirements (if any) for enrollment. Or are they the same as most 20th Century colleges and universities?

Thanks for clearing this up, if you can!

Patrick Jackson khaosjr@yahoo.com

I remember reading somewhere (possibly in the Jedi Academy Trilogy) that Daala was the same age as Luke and Leia, so 19 BBY? If anybody has any sources, please add them. Eric the Grape talk 10:10, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

In the last paragraph of the first section, the following sentence appears. "However, the betrayal of Moff Tol Getelles and the arrival of Empire of the Hand ships to support Fel, forced Daala into a siege at Exodo II." There should absolutely not be a comma in between "Fel" and "forced," as it separates the subject from the verb and object.

2.7 Modified image(s)

The current "hero" image used for Daala is very inaccurate. Her signature look is red hair...always when in her imperial uniform. Even with her older look, she has some grey hair but is still mostly red. Someone with a grey uniform, grey/blonde hair and bangs is very inaccurate. One image from the The Essential Reader's Companion contradicts EVERY OTHER source material, and as such, should be treated as suspect.

I've been asked to put this image "to a vote" but was given zero instruction on how to do this.I would ask that someone that cares about the accuracy of this information do this for the record.--Grafikat (talk) 01:41, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

Possible Anachronism

Star Wars Tales 11 shows Daala (or someone confirmed to have been meant to be her) being present with Governor Tarkin on Alderaan when he first met Princess Leia in 7 BBY, but Tarkin only discovered Daala after her graduation from the academy- which she didn’t enter until 3 BBY.InspectorGregson (talk) 04:00, February 16, 2020 (UTC)