Talk: Asajj Ventress/Archive1

Back to page |
< Talk:Asajj Ventress

This page is an archive of the discussion of an article. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's current talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

CiC

At what point was Asajj Ventress the C-i-C for CIS forces? I'm aware that she was a Commander, but had not seen any reference to her as the head. --SparqMan 06:23, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)

  • Um, pretty much never. That succession box is absolutely bogus. Grievous was in action as early as the First Battle of Geonosis, and so pretty much held the position for the entire duration of the war. QuentinGeorge 07:00, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
    • Even though Ventress wasn't C-i-C, she had the opertunity when Dooku placed Durge, Ventress, and Grievous in a head-to-head-to-head fight which determined who would be the C-i-C. Of course, Grievous won. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 12:24, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
      • Which pretty much establishes GG as sole CiC for the entire war. QuentinGeorge 12:25, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
        • So, on the Asajj Ventress page and the General Grievous page, we'll have to remove Asajj Ventress's name from the C-i-C table. Also, Durge's name will have to be removed from Asajj Ventress's page and Durge's page. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 14:50, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
          • Fixed boxes on Asajj Ventress, Durge, Grievous, and Sev'rance Tann.Cmdr. J. Nebulax 14:55, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Affiliation

It has been made clear that Asajj was not a Sith. She was a Commander in the CIS forces and an agent of Dooku, but it seems a stretch to affiliate her with the Sith. Asajj was no more affiliated with the Sith than Jango Fett or Durge, regardless of her Force skills. --SparqMan 17:41, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)

  • Was she actually trained by Dooku at any point? And did she know that he was a Sith lord? If both these points are true, then i think it's fair to say that her affiliation is Sith. (i'm just not sure if those two points are true) --Azizlight 15:05, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
    • Yes, and yes. She wanted to become a Sith, but Dooku dodged her requests, teaching her only what was needed to to make her an effective agent. She may qualify as a cultist.
      • Actually, I believe Azizlight's questions have already been answered, anonymous user. Admiral J. Nebulax 03:28, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Any chance the Dark Jedi featured in This Article could be Asajj? And as far as I know, all RPG stuff like that is considered part of the official continuity.

  • I think it's pretty obvious that she's supposed to be Ventress. I knew she was by the fifth paragraph, and the bit at the end practically screams "Ventress! Dooku! Sidious!" :P--Spanky The Dolphin 03:58, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • As did I, but I sometimes have a way with reading far too much into things.
    • It's MORE THAN OBVIOUS that's Asajj. So obvious I can't believe we're talking about it... --Master Starkeiller 11:22, 9 Sep 2005 (UTC)
  • Oh, it's her alright. It almost sounds like her battle with Anakin on Yavin 4. Almost is the word that I'm stretching.

Species

I don't think Asajj is a "Rattakian". Osika Kirske looks totally different. QuentinGeorge 04:32, 12 Aug 2005 (UTC)

  • Osika isn't a Rattataki. The Rattataki are the bald near-humans. We don't know the name of the "sharkpeople", Kirske's species, yet. --Master Starkeiller 22:16, 8 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Sith

I think Asajj Ventress should be counted among the Sith characters category. I don't believe that she should be counted as a Sith Lord, but she obviously felt that she was a Sith, and seemed to consider herself more Sith than Separatist. -- SFH 03:30, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Dooku laughed at her and specifically told her that she was "not Sith". You can't get any more explicit than that. QuentinGeorge 03:31, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I'm not saying she should be called Darth Ventress. i'm just saying that she seemed to believe that her allegance was the Sith first, the Confederacy second. Also, it is still listed as one of her affiliations...before CIS. -- SFH 00:46, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • I'm not sure she is any more "affiliated" with the Sith than Jango Fett. QuentinGeorge 06:17, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
    • Jango Fett never claimed that he was Sith, nor was he truly "affiliated" with anyone. Ventress seemed pretty convinced that she was a Sith, and I'm sure she followed many of her ideals. I think when Dooku told her she was no Sith, he was basically saying "You are not nearly as hot as you think you are," and that she was certainly not a full Sith yet. But the biggest difference between "Sith" and "dark Jedi" or the like basically comes down to their philosophy, and I think in that respect she would be considered a follower of the Sith, if not a true Sith herself.Darth Ceratis 00:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
      • 1) Please don't restart old topics. 2) She already has been considered affiliated with the Sith. See the article's infobox. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 00:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
        • Sorry. Just didn't want the discussion to end with that faulty comparison.Darth Ceratis 04:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
          • Well, Fett was still allied with the Sith anyway. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 12:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
            • Not really. There's a difference between being affiliated with a Sith and being affiliated with the Sith order as a whole. Jango was the former only, while Ventress was also the latter. Jango and Durge worked with the Confederacy because it paid the bills and gave them a chance to kill a few people, not because of any Sith ambitions.Darth Ceratis 14:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
              • There isn't any difference between being affiliated with a Sith and being affiliated with the Sith Order. It's like saying that you're affiliated with President Bush but not America. Since Bush is leader of America, you'd be affiliated with both. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 20:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
                • Err, I'd have to disagree there. For one thing the comparison isn't really equivalent, since the Sith order is a belief sytem and not a political system, so it would be more equivalent to say it's like being affiliated with Bush and not the Republican party. Which, in fact, happens: there were democrats that voted for Bush and Republicans that voted for Kerry. Ventress is a Force user, follows the teachings of the Sith, uses lightsabers and dark side Force powers. Jango is none of the above. Also, as I more or less said, Jango is affiliated with dooku in a mercenary capacity only. if Dooku quit paying him, he'd leave. Ventress is there for the power.Darth Ceratis 06:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
                  • But since there are only two Sith at a time, it'd be hard to be affiliated with a Sith and not the entire Sith Order. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 14:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
                    • Again, it's about their philosophy. Ventress was a follower of the Sith teachings, making her a part of the Sith even though she was not a true Sith lord. Jango wasn't a follower of anything. Whether or not there are only two Sith in the order doesn't really matter, semantically speaking. Also, Jango was affiliated with Dooku, but he wasn't really affiliated with Sidious, so he obviously couldn't be affiliated with the whole Sith order. So if you were going to use that logic you'd have to say that Nute gunray was affiliated with the Sith (which is kinda funny to think about).Darth Ceratis 17:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
                      • <sigh> Gunray was affiliated with the Sith, as was Asajj and Jango. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 20:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
                        • No, no, no, you're not getting what I say. it's made more complicated by the fact that the name "Sith" applies to more than one thing. Basically, all I'm trying to say is that Ventress is directly affiliated with the Sith, as in, from the inside. as in a follower of sith teachings, as a dark-side Force user, as a holder of the Sith ideals and someone who wants to be called a Sith. Jango and Gunray are also "affiliated" with the Sith, but in a fundamentally different way. They are working with the sith because the Sith are useful for furthering their own purposes and getting them what they want. they in no way follow Sith teachings, they are in no way connected with the Force, and while their self-advancing goals may paralell those of the Sith, they are different. Also, neither of them ever went so far as to claim that they were Sith, and in my view, the only thing that really separates some dark Jedi from being Sith is that they just don't take that name upon themselves.Darth Ceratis 22:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Noooooooo. Jango and Gunray were "contracted." Contracted, being a legal term, meaning they had a working relationship and Jango and gunray got monetary benefit from it. Ventress's relationship with the Sith was fundamentally different, as she did not get any money out of it and joined the Sith solely because she wanted to develop her abilities and grow stronger in the Dark Side. You can't deny that Jango and Gunray's relationships with the Sith were of a very different nature to Ventress's.Darth Ceratis 05:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
    • That's not my point. My point is that they were all affiliated with the Sith one way or another, and what you said proves you also agree to that. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 13:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
      • Well, yeah, that is what I was saying. My point from the start was that when QuentinGeorge said She wasn't "any more affiliated with the Sith than Jango Fett" that it was not accurate. They are both affiliated with the Sith, but Ventress is certainly more so than Jango was.Darth Ceratis 00:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Creator?

Did John Ostrander created Asajj? Thanks.

  • For the love of God, stop removing everything I say!!! Cmdr. J. Nebulax 21:19, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
    • One: 206.180.134.114, come on and be cooperative. Is it really that hard? Two: Ventress is based on a concept for AOTC that eventually became Dooku, as seen here: Hollis 21:24, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

thumb

Quote

Would anyone object if I were to replace the current quote. My reason being that since Ventress is not a Sith, the current one is misleading, and is not as much about the character as by the character. My suggestion:
"You are no Jedi, girl. You are simply hatred and bile given form."
―Master Fay

Any objections?

Paragraph on Xagobah

Why was it removed? Sure, it wasn't in the correct spot probably, but, for some reason, Xilentshadow removed it. Admiral J. Nebulax 23:47, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

  • It was canonically in the incorrect spot. Xagobah is not the place Asajj would want to go to retreat, and if she had brought the medical ship there, wouldn't alpha have been found?--Xilentshadow900 00:21, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
    • Yet what was in the paragraph was true. It was placed in the wrong spot, but it was canon. Admiral J. Nebulax 01:06, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
      • I'll fix it.--Xilentshadow900 01:10, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
        • Thank you. Admiral J. Nebulax 01:10, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
          • Hmm, I've put it in the best spot I could, but it could be better. If only the author of those kids books had been better informed!--Xilentshadow900 01:13, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Is there really any reason to assume it was Asajj at Xagobah? Dooku did order six of the Fanblade starfighters, of which only 2 are confirmed to have been lost. The other 4 could've been piloted by any number of Dooku's minions. 68.47.234.131 08:11, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Well, Ventress is on the cover of that book, isn't she? Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 12:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
    • But I thought Obsession takes place right before Labryinth of Evil, which is immediately followed by Episode III. So how come we assume that the encounter on Xagobah was after her retreat, not before? 207.200.116.204 00:23, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
      • Well, I just got done looking through some things, and the Second Battle of Xagobah occurs before the Battle of Boz Pity; however, I'm not sure if it's after Skywalker and Ventress's duel on Coruscant. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 20px 00:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
        • However, according to the dates on Obsession and Pursuit, Pursuit appears to take place after Obsession, so the Second Battle of Xagobah could have lasted long enough for it to start before the Battle of Boz Pity and end after it. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 20px 00:33, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Look at it this way, in the book Anakin takes Boba back to the Jedi Temple so he can deliver his "message" to Palpatine. Isn't it totally possible that Asajj just followed him and fought with him there? I never read "Obsession", so don't get mad at me if I'm wrong. -lord_vader1414
  • Is it possible that Anakin fights Asajj on Courscant [i]after[/i] the battle of Xagobah?
    • As I said above, Boba Fett: Pursuit takes place after Obsession. In Obsession, she flees at the end of it. However, she's probably still angry at Anakin, so Bright Flight ends up at Rattatak, where Asajj gets another Fanblade and senses Anakin at Xagobah... That might work. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 13:31, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Where's the proof that it takes place after Obsession?
      • Official timeline placements - Kwenn 20:03, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
        • ...which on closer inspection state Obsession is indeed after Pursuit. Both take place 5 months before RotS, but Pursuit happens a little before. Hmm - Kwenn 20:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Mira?

How can the bounty hunter Mira, and the Jedi Mira be the same person? Unless I am seriously mistaken, they existed about 4,000 years appart. -- tikaheta --

    • They're not the same person. The link is simply screwed up. I'll fix it. -- AdmThrawn --

Ok, thanks! -- tikaheta --

dead.

dead. she is dead. I read it on the ofcial site. P.h 22:40, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)p.h

  • No you didn't. You read it in your mind. You want to go home and rethink your life - Kwenn 22:41, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • No I didnt, I read it in my mind. I want to go home and rethin-... Hay! no I read it on the site! P.h 22:47, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)p.h
      • If you put that in again, I'll have someone lock the page. Admiral J. Nebulax 22:45, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
        • Just where on the site did you read it? We'd all love to know - Kwenn 22:48, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
          • It's not on her Databank entry. Admiral J. Nebulax 22:53, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
            • And don't remove this topic just because you're wrong and you know it. Admiral J. Nebulax 22:53, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • I read itsomewhere it may oficial site. I was pretty sure it was, but every one makes mistakes, right?
      • Yet when you're wrong, you remove a ton of posts. Admiral J. Nebulax 22:59, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
        • yep. sorry won't happen again P.h 23:00, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)p.h
          • It better not. Admiral J. Nebulax 23:01, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
          • Sorry.Sorry.Sorry.Sorry.Sorry.Sorry. I heard that back in the dark times. the times when I believed supershadow. I know I should be ashamed :( P.h 01:33, 18 January 2006 (UTC)p.h

Eye Color

Blue? Really? Looks pretty brown in Obsession. I guess you could sort of argue it's Sith eyes, but...still, looks more brown. Yrfeloran 06:07, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Yes. Comics can screw up minor things like that. Admiral J. Nebulax 12:49, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Sabers

Where's it established that Ventress's sabers were Vosa's? Lieutenant Gerard 23:07, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Well, I believe that they are the same. Admiral J. Nebulax 00:32, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Okay. Why? Lieutenant Gerard 18:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
      • There's a source that says Dooku gave Ventress Vosa's sabers. Admiral J. Nebulax 20:39, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
        • Great. What is it? Lieutenant Gerard 01:19, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
          • My friend showed it to me, I believe. Admiral J. Nebulax 21:26, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
            • Actually, on second thought, I don't remember where I saw it. Admiral J. Nebulax 21:26, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
              • Well, if no one has a source for it, it should probably be removed. Lieutenant Gerard 21:48, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
                • Well, can you provide a source that Ventress's lightsabers weren't Vosa's? Admiral J. Nebulax 21:53, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
                  • The Vosa page said that information came from Leland Chee. Yrfeloran 22:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Dogfighting?

"As an appendix to Ventress's exploits, it was believed she may have returned to the Clone Wars, despite her declaration aboard the medical frigate. She was reportedly seen dogfighting Boba Fett and Anakin Skywalker in a Fanblade starfighter over Xagobah. Her reasons for returning to the war, if the pilot was indeed Ventress herself, remain a mystery." Fanon, methinks? Cutch 06:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

    • Just saw the above thread on the same subject. Thanks. Cutch 18:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

What Was That??

On Ohma-D'un, when Asajj Ventress is dueling Obi-Wan, she apperently has the power to reanimate the dead through the dark-side of the force. Is there any name for this power?? LordRevan 01:59, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Lightning

Should I add that Asajj Ventress was able to use Force Lightning? -- DurgeFan 15:46, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

If you read Victories and Sacrifices you'll se what I mean. By what your saying TPM Anakin could beat DE Sidious in a fight just cause he's the Chosen One and can't die. Maybe Asajj couldn't have killed him cause then ANH wouldn't make any sense but she was stronger than he was and would have been able to beat him if (and only if) Victories and Sacrifices had taken place before the Microseries (Volume 1).

  • First of all, Palpatine wanted Anakin to become a Sith. Second of all, the Dark Empire Palpatine wouldn't be able to fight the Episode I Anakin. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 11:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Asajj does use lightning in the Clone Wars Mini-game on the kid section on StarWars.com... But it's a duel between Anikan And Asajj on Rattatak, which never happened in any established canon, so I'm not really sure... Stormiefan 02:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Great...

MoffRebus just vandalized the article by reverting it to how it looked probably a long time ago. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 13:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Order of appearances

I thought Ventress' first chronological appearance was when she introduces herself to Tyranus and Sidious in Clone Wars, followed by a second entry into the timeline in the graphic novel story The New Face of War? Assuming I have not got this wrong, why then does the Appearances section not reflect this? -Kev-La Ttolya 16:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Jedi: Mace Windu occurs between those two - Kwenn 16:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Oh, OK. So, why does the Appearance section not show that either? :) -Kev-La Ttolya 17:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
      • It does. Although each chapter is listed, the presence of Clone Wars in that section is as a whole; it's not separated by individual chapters, so it's all placed at the start, not mixed between other entries. However, that Shadowfeed source doesn't belong there - Kwenn 17:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Reanimation

  • In The New Face of War, Ventress uses the force to reanimate Gungan corpses. Is this the only time, anyone has used this ability?.
    • hi, if you look up to what was that you will see theres already a topic on this, in furture please try to scim the talk already here incase your topic is already being conversed about. Btw we didn't even figure out what it was, theres no canon source Jedi Dude 19:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Timeline

This article states that Asajj fought Kenobi on Ohma-D'un and again on Queyta before fighting Anakin on Yavin. That's riduculous. While the battle of Ohma-D'un doesn't have a timeline on this site if then she was able to take on Kenobi and another Padawan 2 on 1 and nearly win then Anakin should have been no problem for her on Yavin. And during the battle on Ohma-D'un she never tried to kill Anakin, as was her mission, and on Yavin they talked to each otehr as if they'd never met before. So the duel on Yavin had to take palce before the Battle of Ohma-D'un. Also, here:http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Star_Wars_Republic_53:_Blast_Radius it says that took place approx. 6 months after AOTC where the battle on Yavin took palce 4 months after, so the events in this article need to be changed.

I agree, but he wouldn't have put up a better fight than Kenobi did.

Yeah, he would have been, Kenobi > Anakin and Asajj was beating Kenobi.

  • No, he wouldn't have, because Anakin had to fulfill the prophecy of the Chosen One. Also, Kenobi wouldn't have been killed, because he would have needed to train Luke. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 14:06, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Kenobi would have been killed if Anakin and Alpha hadn't saved him and then he wouldn't have been able to Luke. ANH only happened cause Anakin saved him. And Anakin could have died, and the prophecy would have been unfulfilled. That'd be like if I said Anakin would have died on Mustafar if Palpatine hadn't saved him and you said "You couldn't die, he has to fullfil the prophecy!" the fact is Asajj was stronger than Obi-Wan and therefor was also stronger than Anakin. Point closed. If you disagree go read the comic and you'll see.

Okay, since someone deleted what I said, the fact of the matter is that if the events that take place in Victories and Sacrifices really took place before what heppened in the Microseries then Anakin would have died at the hands of Asajj and, thus, the prohpecy would have been left unfulfilled, as not all prophecies are fulfilled. The reason that Anakin did NOT die and the events of ANH are as they are is because the events of Victories and Sacrifices took place after the events that took place in Chapters 17-19 of the Clone Wars Microseries, as I have pointed out in the discussion section and fixed in the article. But just because a prophecy "A prophecy that misread could have been" says that Anakin will destroy the Sith and bring balance to the Force doesn't mean that Anakin will necessairly fulfill the prohpecy, in this case he did but if he had died then it would have been left unfulfilled and that's all.

If he had died then the prophecy would have been read incorrectly. But he didn't die so the prophecy was read correctly, but Victories and Sacrifices Asajj > Anakin.

You think that every prophecy ever made was fulfilled? Because that's not the case.

Yes, but the fact is Anakin lived and the pro[hecy was as it was because Victorties and sacrifices takes place after the Microseries volume 1.

Yes, Asajj was stronger than Anakin and could have kileld him and if she had then the prophecy would be wrong. Yoda already said in ROTS that the prophecy could have been read incorrectly.

Again with the finger!

Some moron has posted a pic of his middle finger on the page, but I figured out how to get rid of it.

Two conflicting sources

There are two conflicting cannon sources for this article. The episode of Clone Wars gives the time line that she immediately went off to the battle of Battle of Muunilinst after receiving her curve-hilted lightsabers from Dooku, while Jedi: Mace Windu gives a longer interval between the two events.

Unless she was asleep for a few weeks.
  • Or she took a detour to fight Windu. There's nothing that says she couldn't have. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 20:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Yes but it shows her before that with the hilted lightsabers, in Jedi: Mace Windu.--Herbsewell 20:32, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
      • Yeah, I know that. That's why I said that, after leaving for Muunilinst, she could have went to face Windu. Dooku might have holo'ed her and said "Anakin can wait. Head to Ruul to face Mace Windu." Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 20:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
        • Do yo have the comic Jack?--Herbsewell 20:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
          • Yes I do. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 20:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
            • Go to page 89.--Herbsewell 20:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
              • Why don't you just tell me instead of me looking for it? Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 20:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
                • Well on that page it shows Dooku briefing Asajj to go to the meeting of Mace Windu.--Herbsewell 20:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
                  • Where does that briefing take place? Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 23:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
                    • No idea, but it's definitely not in the same time frame as Clone Wars.--Herbsewell 01:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                    • Doesn't matter. Officially, the events of the cartoon, with the various comic events in between that event and her fighting Anakin. QuentinGeorge 01:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                      • But they aren't. The cartoon shows her going directly to Muunilinst.--Herbsewell 01:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                        • No, it doesn't. She doesn't say "I'm going straight to Muunilinst." She simply leaves Rattatak. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 02:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                          • She went to Ruul two days after she was briefed. Jack she went to Muunilinst because there was nowhere else she would go. In the comic it shows her on some world not mentioned or known bing briefed. When she was informed of the mission she had her hilted lightsabers, which meant is was after battle of Muunilinst, which is impossible because she was already defeated by Anakin Skywalker. Jack can you please tell me if she briefed before or after the battle of Muunilinst.--Herbsewell 16:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                            • If canon says she went to Ruul before Muunilinst, she went to Ruul. I'll repeat this again: When she left Rattatak in Clone Wars, no one ever said she was going straight to Muunilinst. There are no conflicting sources here. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 20:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                              • She couldn't have gone before because before she did not have the hilted lightsabers.--Herbsewell 20:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                                • Herbsewell, I'm saying that when it shows Ventress leaving Rattatak after getting her lightsabers, she heads for Ruul before Muunilinst. I've been saying that same thing over and over again. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 20:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                                  • No, it shows Dooku briefing her on the mission in some other planet.--Herbsewell 20:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • What source?--Herbsewell 20:50, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Canon is my source. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 20:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
      • Are you a mongoloid? Book, comic, poster, what?--Herbsewell 20:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
        • You having nothing to back up your claim, either. If you stop, I'll stop. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 20:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
          • Well when two canon sources contradict each other, I want a source to settle it, now what is your source? Jack I've been spewing backed up claims since this thing started.--Herbsewell 21:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
            • End it there. This discussion has gone on long enough, and has contributed nothing. If either of you finds a source, post it. Otherwise, stop - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 21:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
              • I have, he hasn't. Clone Wars chapter 7 vs. Jedi: Mace Windu, pg. 89.--Herbsewell 21:04, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                • Where does it state Rattatak and Muunilinst are concurrent? I believe the Rattatak sequence is treated as a flashback, or simply set earlier in the timeline. Otherwise it just confuses things - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 21:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                  • Okay when would you say was the mission to Ruul? Before or After the Battle of Muunilinst.--Herbsewell 21:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                    • Between Rattatak and Muunilinst. There's an official date somewhere - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 21:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                      • And FYI, Herbsewell, I tried to end this numerous times by providing the facts. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 21:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                      • Okay, let's hear them.--Herbsewell 21:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                        • The dates, from the New Essential Chronology: Ventress' first appearance is 2.5 months into the Clone Wars, on Ohma-D'un, followed by Ruul half a month after. Thus, Rattatak must occur before that, possibly after the Dark Reaper project, since Dooku would be looking for a replacement for Cydon Prax. Muunilinst is 4 months in - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 21:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                          • Now, it's over. No more posts. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 21:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                            • Jack shut up. When was she defeated by Anakin?--Herbsewell 21:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                              • All Clone Wars episodes are 4 months after, though it makes no mention of the Rattatak part. The space battle and duel happens during Muunilinst, but Ventress has been established for the past two months - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 21:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Stop arguing. We're discussing here, not throwing hissy fits. With the dates I provided, is there now any discrepancy? - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 21:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
    • No. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 21:22, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
      • And I apologize, Herbsewell. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 21:27, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
        • Where did she go after she received her lightsabers?--Herbsewell 21:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
          • Probably Ohma-D'un. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 21:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
            • That's her first known mission, at least - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 21:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
              • It would make sense, because Anakin was involved with that mission. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 21:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                • I thought her mission there was to oversee the invasion of Naboo.--Herbsewell 21:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                  • Ostensibly, yes, but while fighting Obi-Wan, she mentions "the boy", despite not having met Anakin yet. So it seems she knows of his involvement in the mission - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 21:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                    • Which means that her first mission was separate from that one.--Herbsewell 21:40, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                    • Not really; doesn't Sidious tell her about Anakin on Rattatak? And, interestingly, though Durge thinks the mission was a failure, Ventress disagrees, as she now knows "my enemy's face - and his heart" - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 21:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                      • Well technically she failed because the mission was to kill him.--Herbsewell 21:43, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
                        • It's probably more a case of losing the battle, but hoping to win the war. That one mission was more concerned with the poisoning of Naboo, wheras Ventress will have other opportunities to kill Anakin, and having gauged his skill will help with that - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 21:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Okay but Durge was killed by Obiwan and Anakin over Maramere for the final time correct?--Herbsewell 21:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • ...I actually for the first time read the page and saw that her end was not when Anakin first defeated her. I guess this concludes the discussion.--Herbsewell 23:53, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
    • As much as I want this to end, how does that end this discussion? Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 23:56, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
      • Okay how bout this, you can keep talking but I won't talk back.--Herbsewell 00:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
        • What's wrong with you? I just asked you a simple question. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 00:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
          • I'm not part of this discussion any more.--Herbsewell 00:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
            • So you won't even answer that last question? Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 00:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
              • It doesn't end the discussion in that sense, no one can end a discussion except you of course Jack because for some reason you're better than the rest of us. I'm just going to stop typing questions and answers.--Herbsewell 00:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
                • Herbsewell, I know I'm no better than anyone else around here. I don't know why you went from one atitude to another, but if you're happy, fine. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 00:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
                  • Well you sure act like it Jack. I've seen you countless of times declare a discussion ended and everyone else disagrees, and ignores you. Just the fact that you've posting comments proves you have to have the last word.--Herbsewell 00:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
                    • I say that a discussion is ended only if it has nothing to contribute, because then there's no need for such a discussion. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 03:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
                      • Well it's so nice that you're always there to announce it.--Herbsewell 03:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
                        • Wookieepedia is not the place for pointless discussions. We're not a forum, and most don't realize that until after they start a topic. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 03:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
                          • Well this discussion is pointless because we are not talking about a specific topic. You can keep talking, I could care less.--Herbsewell 03:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Gungan Zombies

Does anyone know how Asajj resurrected the dead gungans and has it ever been used before?

Battle of Xagobah appearance (for those who think it's not canon).

In hopes of ending this issue over Ventress's appearance in the Battle of Xagobah, please read the book Boba Fett: Pursuit. It is in fact Ventress, as she is clearly depicted on the cover. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 03:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

How did she appear in the ship?
  • Her fanblade starfighter engages in a dogfight with Slave I. .... 03:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Take it to your talk pages, guys. StarNeptuneTalk to me! 15:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
    • That won't help, StarNeptune. This has gone on for too long, and I tried to end it. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 15:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
      • ...By continuously posting comments.--Herbsewell 15:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
        • If you two have a beef with each other, take it to your talk pages. Unless you are talking about how to improve the Asajj Ventress article (and it doesn't seem like you are anymore), this page is not the place for it. StarNeptuneTalk to me! 15:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm going to try to get this topic back on the track I had planned for it. Anon: Further additions of "It is unknown if it was actually her" or anything along that line will not be tolerated. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 16:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Okay, I know this has been brought up before, but, Asajj Ventress supposedly dies at Boz Pity, and she wakes up in hyperspace and orders the captain away from the war. And in the Boba Fett book she is assumed to be in the fanblade fighting against ani and Boba, a couple months later.

BUT, if you look at the publication dates, the Boba Fett book was published in Dec 2004. And Obsession was published in May 2005. A near 5 month after Boba Fett was published. It makes more sense for the more recent book to be correct, even though they take place in a different order. It could be that the author of Boba Fett thought she would still be alive in that time frame. Any answers? JediBob 21:08, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Redeemed Jedi

Should she make the list? Micah Giett 21:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Her age?

Any idea how old Asajj is? She keeps being called a 'girl' or a 'child', so she must not be especially old. Is she around Anakin's age? Or is there nothing to indicate anything in particular? - Indy Gold 21:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Quinlanfan 16:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Obviously, at least 26 years older than she was in the Clone Wars era. Like Jack said before, we don't know her age, nor can we really judge it due to her being non-Human - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 16:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
    • This is going to be fan-calculations, but it's worth a shot: Supposing Ventress's physical appearance changes over time like Humans and she doesn't use anything to make her look younger, I'd say she's in her thirties during the Clone Wars. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 21:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Do the Ratatak, or what ever there called live longer than humans? Also, is it possible that Aurra Sing could be part Ratatak? Quinlanfan

tatoo

At what point did she get the head tatoos? In clone wars TV show she does not have them. Is this just a mess up with the cartoon? Grand Admiral Nick Vos [Holonet] Republic Emblem

  • Okay, Vos, stop asking questions we can't answer. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 20:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Sorry! Gosh! I did not know that yall didn't know. so yall said that Aurra Sing was not half Ratatak?

Grand Admiral Nick Vos [Holonet] Republic Emblem

  • I thought it said in Dark Rondezvous that she added a tattoo for each Jedi she killed (though I don't think it added up right, as she'd killed at least sixteen by the point of that book and I don't think she had THAT many tattoos) so, if that's true, then she wouldn't have had them in the cartoon because she simply hadn't killed any Jedi at that point. - Indy Gold 19:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Redemption and Battle of Xagobah

I just checked and found that from that the events of Boba Fett: Pursuit actually occur before Obsession. Boba Fett: Pursuit is set in 19.5 BBY, which is technically in 20 BBY, and Obsession is set in 19 BBY.--Lord OblivionSith holocron20px 04:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Force unleashed

In the recent Game Informer it said that Vader's student may hunt down Asajj and Shaak Ti in the game Force Unleashed. Has that been comfirmed? Quinlanfan 21:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

  • All opinions off of talk pages. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 01:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
    • How is that an opinion?--Herbsewell 18:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
      • Presumably the Game Informer article was opining that opponents such as Ventress may be faced in the game; I don't believe there's been anything official to state Asajj has a role here - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 18:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
          • Thank goodness! Hopefully the "May" ay mean a no. Quinlanfan 20:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
            • Herbsewell: Quinlanfan originally had "I refuse to believe that she is going to be killed!" in his post before he removed it. Quinlanfan: Shaak Ti is in The Force Unleashed. Concept art for the game shows this. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 21:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
                    • I'd never thought I'd say this, but Shaak Ti actually looks hot. That was not an opinion, I was just stating facts.Quinlanfan 19:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
                    • I agree, Shaak Ti is hot. Look up Miravi Shaak Ti for a more in depth look at the character. Ventress isn't that bad either is you don't mind bald and a little crazy. Nice tits, ya'know?

Head Stripes

What is the source saying she added a stripe to her head for each warlord kill? And when someone discovers that, how many tatoos did she have on her head? Chack Jadson 22:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Redeemed?

Could she really be considered redeemed? She herself said that the reason for her warning might be to simply scorn and seek revenge upon Dooku rather than help Kenobi. I think we should change the title of that section to "Disapperance", or something...Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 30px17:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

  • I'd call it redeemed, because her actions onboard the Republic medical frigate show she wasn't really evil anymore. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 00:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
    • I'd have to agree. Had she still been her dark self, she'd have just killed the pilots and taken the ship herself. - JMAS 00:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
      • Exactly. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 00:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
        • OK, thanks, just wanted some input bfore I do anything.--Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 30px21:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
          • No problem. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 14:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
            • Unless she needed the pilots to um, pilot the ship. I don't think you can run something the size of a frigate all by yourself. At least not without proper training. Both Anakin Skywalker, who was aspecially gifted, and Lorana Jinzler, who had proper training, managed to *crash land* capital ships being their sole pilots.Gorthuar 22:18, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
              • We already established that, Gorthuar. No need to restart the topic. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 11:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
                • Begging your pardon, my good Admiral, but in my opinion what you have already established is wrong. In other words: I belive the title of the 4th section shouldn't be "Redemption" because there's really no proof for that. Thus I saw need to restart the topic.Gorthuar 23:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
                  • Since no one seems to care, I'm changing "Redemption" to "Disappearance" Gorthuar 20:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
                    • And I have changed it back. If you've read the comic, the medical transport was not a large vessel at all. Much smaller than a YV-666 light freighter, which can be operated by a single individual as evidenced by Bossk and Uran Lavint, the smaller craft could easily have been piloted by Ventress herself. Redeemed it will stay. - JMAS 21:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
                      • Or, how about we have it as "Redemption and disappearance"? —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 21:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
                        • Sure. That works. - JMAS 21:06, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
                          • I still don't think there is enough evidence of her redemption, but I'm not going to fight over it. Gorthuar 16:11, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
                            • Or am I... Just read the comic again. She didn't kill them, because she needed them. It goes like this: One of the pilots asks won't she kill them, and she replies that she won't and that she still needs to treat her wounds (so, I understand, she'd rather spend time in a bacta tank than pilot the ship). Then she does a mind trick and orders the pilots to change course. Any more objections to removing the "redemption" part? Gorthuar 21:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
                              • Yes, because Asajj could just have easily killed the pilots, take control of the ship, and go into a healing trance once the course was set. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 22:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
                                • That is you make an assumption that this kind of ship wouldn't require a pilot's constant supervision. I know the Millenium Falcon worked that way, but we have no evidence this "medical frigate" did. Should I provide the whole page as reference? Gorthuar 23:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
                                  • Darth Sion was able to control a whole Hammerhead-class capital ship on his own. I think Ventress could handle a medical frigate. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 23:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
                                    • Was Darth Sion doing it from inside a bacta tank? Somehow I doubt it. Plus, though Ventress was undeniably powerful, a Sith Lord such as Darth Sion would have been more powerful. To give exact quotes: Pilot: "You won't kill us...?" Ventress: "No. I still have wounds to be treated." Does mind trick. "But you will change course". No real evidence of redemption. Gorthuar 23:29, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
                                      • Nowhere does it say that Ventress had to be in a bacta tank. And let's not forget that Sion's body was in a far worse condition than Ventress was, and he managed to single-handedly pilot a large capital ship though an asteroid field. Ventress could have easily controlled the medical frigate on her own with the wounds she sustained. And if she wasn't redeemed, why would she have told Obi-Wan the Confederacy's plans? —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 11:54, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Sion was a Sith Lord. Ventress was a pissant Dark Jedi. Big difference. I'd say remove the "Redemption" thing personally, since A) It's not integeral, B) It's causing issue, and C) It's not crystal clear. Thefourdotelipsis 12:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Compared to all the other Dark Jedi Dooku used, I wouldn't call Ventress a "pissant" Dark Jedi. However, Dark Jedi do tend to kill their prisoners, and Ventress doesn't want to kill the pilots. I still say "Redemption" stays. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 12:08, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
      • Eh, I think you could probably get away with a generic name. Thefourdotelipsis 12:22, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
        • Indeed we would. In my opinion assuming she's reedemed is inserting one's personal point of view into the article. The author seems to have left it ambigious on purpose. Ventress gives a wide variety of reasons. To give exact quotes: Ventress reveals the Separatists will attack the Core Worlds. Obi: "I thought you'd use your dying breath to curse us." Ventress: "Perhaps I have..." "...Or perhaps I just... hate Dooku more than I hate you..." "Or maybe... you were righ about me... all along...". These are three vaild reasons for her revealing the plans. The one-in-three chance of redemption isn't enough to include it as part of the article. Gorthuar 19:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
          • It seems to me that, by putting the "maybe you were right about me all along" at the end, it shows Ventress was redeemed. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 19:40, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
            • Seeing how directing Obi-wan's and Anakin's attention to the Core Worlds ended, "perhaps I have" (cursed you) might have more meaning. Seing how the comic book ended with Ventress commanding the pilots to take her as far away from Dooku as possible, "Or perhaps I just hate Dooku more than I hate you" also may be more meaningful. I belive the choice was left to the individual reader. If you wish to belive that she was redeemed, suit yourself. But we shouldnt' make it an official line of Wookiepedia. Gorthuar 21:28, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
              • Everything she says actually points to her being redeemed: She warns the Republic of an upcoming assault on the Core Worlds, she says she hates Dooku more than Obi-Wan (when it was originally the other way around), she says Obi-Wan may have been right about her all along, and she spares the medical frigate's pilots lives. An unredeemed Dark Jedi allied with the Confederacy wouldn't have said and done those things. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 23:43, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
              • "allied with the Confederacy" being the key words here. One can bring his alliance to the Confederacy (or any organisation, at that matter) to an end without actually abandoning the Dark Side. Gorthuar 00:02, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Varonat?

It says: Kenobi stole both Ky Narec's lightsaber and Ventress's own starfighter, using the latter to reach Varonat..., but didn't Obi-Wan and Alpha crash-land the fanblade on Riflor? I think Anakin and Ki Adi were sent to Varonat, then diverted to Riflor to rescue Obi-Wan and Alpha after Anakin had the vision of the fanblade crashing on a planet with three suns. I'm going to change it in the article, but I wanted to provide why. - Indy Gold 19:28, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Help?

I want to nominate a quote but i don't understand how(i think it is a great choice).

"I am fear. I am the queen of a blood-soaked planet and an architect of genocide. I have helped to crack the Galaxy in half with this war and conquered every enemy I have ever faced—including death. All except for you."
―Asajj Ventress to Obi-Wan Kenobi[src]

Legacy of the Force

Dose anyone know where is was officially says that she will appear in Revelation, and Invincible? I talked to someone who said Lucasarts released this info awhile back.--Reptileus 18:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

  • I don't see what any videogames would have to do with the novels. -- Ozzel 19:07, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
  • I don't think she'd still be alive would she? I know there's speculation that she was present in Inferno, but I think she'd be dead. The Clone Wars were what? 60 Years ago, and she had to be older than Anakin. I think it's safe to assume she's probably dead. Meselyn 04:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

WHAT. THE. F##K?

What the fuck does that mean? I just asked for a fucking source about Ventress not being that other character and that "grabbing him and exchanging places with him" part that sounds very suspicious. And my edits were reverted? Why? And the article was locked. Why? How the fuck does this fucking place work anyway? Aren't we supposed to source everything? Doesn't the article itself have a big fucking tag stuck on top of it that says it needs sourcing? What the fuck??? --Master Starkeiller 15:15, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

    • It would be far easier to take you seriously if you calmed down a little -- AdmirableAckbar [Talk] 20:59, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
  • I want a source that says they are the same character. Yours is the larger assumption. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 21:37, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
    • The cartoon implies that the guy is Ventress all along. Is that thing about Asajj taking his place after he greeted Dooku unsourced or is there a source for it? That's all I wanna know. Sourced=we keep it. Unsourced=we remove it. Isn't that how it's supposed to be done? I don't claim that they are the same character, I just want a source for Ventress knocking the guy out and taking his place, something that is never seen or mentioned in the cartoon. --Master Starkeiller 14:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
      • I think Dooku's quote, "Our host would applaud you, posthumously" pretty heavily implies that said host has just been killed. Eggmanland 23:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
        • But not at that moment. Dooku's putting two and two together that Asajj has already taken the host's place, and by dint of the simple fact that Asajj is there, the host is likely dead - Captain Kwenn – Talk 23:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
          • I dunno. The camera closes in on Dooku while the incident (whatever incident it might be) goes on off-screen. If it were just Asajj taking off a disguise, it'd be kind of pointless to go through the trouble of removing the host from the shot, or mentioning that he's now dead. Eggmanland 23:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
            • Doesn't Dooku specifically say, "you mask your presence well", or something to the effect of essentially confirming it's Ventress all along? - Captain Kwenn – Talk 23:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
              • As I understood it, he was talking about how she silently kills Mr. Host (does this guy even have a name?), without Mr. Host ever realizing it. He dies just off-screen, Dooku praises Ventress for her skills, and mentions that Mr. Host would've also been impressed with the silent kill, if he wasn't currently dead. Eggmanland 03:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
                • It is clear that Ventress just "takes off" the disguise. Listen to the "Force woosh" as the camera zooms in on Dooku. We never saw any Dooku's guide, only Ventress Force-cloaked as Dooku's guide. To imply that she moved silently enough to take the guide's place is ridiculous to me. She'd never try pulling that trick to a half-blind Whiphid, not a Sith Lord! She used Force Concealment all along and even then, of course, Dooku realized the trick, 'cause it's a mind trick really, and Dooku's too powerful for it. Pages should be merged. --Master Starkeiller 09:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
    • all i siad was that saw someone talk about something at Lucuse Arts (Lucuse Arts is part the main group so hear about what else is happening in Star Wars Includeing the Novles and T.V. Shows) that included the Return of Asajj Ventress in Iegacy. I don't know if it was true or not. Someone siad they saw it somewhere. I was wondering if any of you guys knew where it might be! --Reptileus 19:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Errm... Any chances that this page may once again became open to editing? I just wanted to make a minor change - the section named Early Life is incorrectly placed twice with the first one being completely empty. Mauser 08:46, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

What really happened to Asajj...

I have spent time going over my books and comics and am still confused about the Pursuit Obsession debate. I emailed a question about it to star wars insider. Hopefuly they will feature it in their Q&A section and we will finaly have a clear answer. I will let you know, or just keep a watch on the Q&A section of SW Insider! User:Anzati02

First Appearance

  • According to this article, Ventress' first appearance was in Jedi: Mace Windu , however, This fact is not reflected in the character section in the Jedi: Mace Windu article. I would change this myself (on the windu comic page) But I have never read any of the Jedi: Comics before, so I cannot confirm the authenticity of this. Is this in fact true, and if so someone possessing the knowledge first-hand should change this. --ForceWound 17:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Leather

According to the Cestus Deception her robe was made of Sullust leather and I wanted to place it in the article but I absolutely have no idea where. Maby you guys could put it somewhere nice.----Inmobilus 10:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)