Forum:TC:Multi-kilometer Star Destroyer

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Multi-kilometer Star Destroyer

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:00, June 3, 2014 (UTC)

Multi-kilometer Star Destroyer (history - links - logs - delete - protect)

From what I can tell, this article does not seem to refer to any specific type of Star Destroyer, but to many different designs. It seems like the creator of the article merely combined a lot of unrelated material to make this article. I don't see any reason to have this.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 01:19, May 27, 2014 (UTC)

Delete

  1. As nominator.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 01:19, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Here's VT's reasoning on creating the article: "I wanted to reference the mention of "multi-mile Star Destroyers" in one of the Dorling Kindersley books, but I was stupid and forgot the passage (and the book), so I had to settle for another solid source. Since this takes place in a time frame before the Super-class, and there's nothing to actually showcase where exactly Star Destroyers end and Star Cruisers begin, I made this to have a slight upper-level. There could be one class, there could be several. This is just a catch-all, really. If the ISB says things like "one SD usually being enough to squash a small planetary uprising", and Jerec contemplates using a bigger SD for his mission to Sulon, that's worth mentioning." Basically, even he's admitting that the article's complete BS, and that it's not an actual ship class. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 01:20, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ^ This. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:23, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
  4. I'm surprised it's lasted this long. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 01:37, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Evidence is too thin. —Silly Dan (talk) 01:40, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
  6. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 01:58, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
  7. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 02:40, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
  8. Per Cade multiple times. Trip391 (talk) 02:43, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
  9. COME ON BLACKHAWKS JangFett (Talk) 04:34, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
  10. Admiral, the star destroyer is going down. Clone Commander Lee Talk 09:51, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
  11. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:24, May 28, 2014 (UTC)
  12. Again, I'm tempted to outright CSD this.
    Master JonathanCouncil Chambers
    05:51 UTC ThuMay 29, 2014
  13. JA. Winterz (talk) 14:01, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
  14. 1358 (Talk) 18:15, May 30, 2014 (UTC)
  15. If you CSD'd this, though, Jonathan, we wouldn't all have a chance to eyeroll over VT's ridiculous antics. Until his next bogus article came up, anyway. jSarek (talk) 21:32, May 30, 2014 (UTC)
  16. Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:50, May 30, 2014 (UTC)
  17. Manoof (talk) 08:23, June 2, 2014 (UTC)

Keep

Description