Forum:TC:K'Kruhk's hat (second nomination)

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:K'Kruhk's hat (second nomination)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was merge into K'Kruhk. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:53, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

K'Kruhk's hat (talk - history - links - logs)

Now that its novelty has faded, I think it's time to put this back into the trash compactor. The article has no in-universe significance, and a questionable OOU significance as a TFN forum meme. The information belongs in the BTS section of the K'kruhk article at best. Relevant discussion: Forum:TC:K'Kruhk's hat. --Imperialles 13:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Merge into K'Kruhk

  1. Per my reasons outlined above. --Imperialles 13:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  2. Should it be in K'Kruhk's article? Yes, absolutely. It has sufficient notability in the fan community that it should be mentioned somewhere, and the character's article is the legitimate place for that. Should it have it's own article? Not by a longshot. Though I wouldn't be surprised if people searched for it occasionally, so appropriate redirects should be maintained. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 13:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  3. Per Culator. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:58, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  4. Per Culator. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 14:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  5. Notable enough to mention BTS, but not enough for an article unless there's IU material specifically about the hat. Fits with the treatment of Mimas and England. —Silly Dan (talk) 16:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  6. I actually agree in this case. There doesn't seem to be much more presented in the hat article versus the original article on K'Kruhk. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:59, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  7. Merge the bugger. It be time for K'Kruhk to hang up his hat. Trak Nar Ramble on 07:00, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  8. Chack Jadson (Talk) 15:22, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  9. Assuning it will actually be merged, not just redirected. MauserComlink 17:36, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
    • The info is largely duplicated already. Since this seems to be snowballing, anyone is welcome to finish the job. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 18:16, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  10. Relic of a bygone age -- —Harrar (Cut the comm chatter) 18:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  11. Bah. CC7567 (talk) 18:54, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  12. Huzzah. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:25, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  13. Bandwaggoning - JMAS Hey, it's me! 23:35, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  14. This why theirs no "Ki-Adi-Mundi hat" JangFett Talk 00:13, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  15. Make it a section under BTS and merge it. --Golden Monkey 12:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  16. As decent a hat as it is... --Darth tom Imperial Emblem (Imperial Intelligence) 13:01, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  17. Never liked this article. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 16:13, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  18. Per Culator and Silly Dan. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 23:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  19. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 02:15, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  20. Per Culator. Cyfiero 07:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  21. Grunny (Talk) 07:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  22. Per Culator. Seems kinda pointless to vote in this landslide though :P. —Xwing328(Talk) 07:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
    Snowball clause? -- Riffsyphon1024 07:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Keep