Forum:TC:Evasive action

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Evasive action

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Imperators II(Talk) 15:26, October 20, 2018 (UTC)

Evasive action

I don't think I even need to say anything, but here goes. The first sentence explains why these articles should be deleted: Evasive action was a catch-all term.... Exactly. This isn't a tactic or a formal maneuver. It's a self-explanatory dictionary definition that means "get the hell out of the way." Since Wookieepedia is not a dictionary, let's take evasive action to avoid having these unnecessary articles. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:22, October 11, 2018 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:22, October 11, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Yep. 1358 (Talk) 20:22, October 11, 2018 (UTC)
  3. WINAD. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 20:25, October 11, 2018 (UTC)
  4. Memory Alpha, the Star Trek wiki, has a worthwhile page about evasive maneuvers, given that they actually have types and patterns of evasive maneuvers, such as the Picard Maneuver. This here, though? No, not worthwhile. Toodle-oo. ProfessorTofty (talk) 21:08, October 11, 2018 (UTC)
  5. NanoLuukeCloning facility 21:58, October 11, 2018 (UTC)
  6. Exiled Jedi (talk) 22:20, October 11, 2018 (UTC)
  7. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 23:11, October 11, 2018 (UTC)
  8. Let us solemnly admit our grief over the fact that there is no Picard Maneuver in Star Wars. Imperators II(Talk) 10:45, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
  9. Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 10:52, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
  10. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 11:10, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
  11. The, Evasive action, the. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 11:12, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
  12. Fan26 (Talk) 12:41, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
  13. Brandon Rhea(talk) 15:30, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
  14. Asithol (talk) 15:56, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
  15. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:09, October 15, 2018 (UTC)
  16. Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:19, October 15, 2018 (UTC)
  17. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:15, October 17, 2018 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Wookieepedia has a breast article. If this goes, it should go too. Either keep this or merge it. SavagePanda845 11:58, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
    • The breast article has unique in-universe information, which hasn't been added yet to the canon page, but is evident in the Legends version. Six-breasted females only appear in the Star Wars universe, not in the real word (thankfully). However, the nominated articles are just dictionary terms which have no difference from their real world counterparts. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 12:13, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
      • But Evasive action does have in-universe information. I'm pretty sure that a starship wouldn't be able to dodge let alone find a Death Star to use the evasive action tactic on in real life. SavagePanda845 15:05, October 15, 2018 (UTC)
    • Administrative note: In the interest of staying on topic with regards to this forum, I've removed the previous comment relating to the breast article debate. This is not the forum to debate the merits of the breast article, a topic that continues to demonstrate its high potential for turmoil. Any further attempts to continue this discussion on this forum will be considered disruption and treated as such. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:47, October 12, 2018 (UTC)

Comments