Forum:CT:Requests for removal of review board membership

This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Support proposal. Imperators II^(Talk) 20:19, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

---

This CT proposes the creation of a Wookieepedia:Requests for removal of review board membership page. After this other CT, every position of authority over the wiki can be removed with a community vote, but the review boards would need an additional page since the members do not get appointed via RFU. The system would work similarly to the RFRUR. The page would contain the following content:

{{Title-shortcut|WP:RFRRB}}
{{Boardsnav}}
[[Category:Wookieepedia peer review|Requests for removal of review board membership]]
A measure against members of the [[Wookieepedia:EduCorps|EduCorps]], [[Wookieepedia:AgriCorps|AgriCorps]], or [[Wookieepedia:Inquisitorius|Inquisitorius]] that have failed to meet their review quota on several occasions, deliberately worked against Wookieepedia, or acted in a harmful way against other users.

Voting ends fourteen days (336 hours) after the start of nomination.

To view past requests, see the [[Wookieepedia:Requests for removal of review board membership rights/Archive|archive]].

'''Requirements:''' 

#There exists substantial proof that the member of the review boards has failed to meet their reviewing responsibilities on several occasions, has worked deliberately against Wookieepedia, engaged in behavior that has damaged the image of the Wookieepedia community, and/or abused their powers.
#Links to said proof must be provided. Edits to Wookieepedia, comments on other websites, and other communications (with respect to the [[Wookieepedia:Privacy policy|Wookieepedia Privacy policy]]) may be used as evidence.
#If a member of the AgriCorps and/or the Inquisitorius is removed from the EduCorps, they will be removed from the higher boards as well. The contrary does not apply.
#Participating registered users' votes must have a 2/3 supermajority for the relevant position to be removed. (Only users who have been registered for over a month—from the day the nomination is put forth—are counted.)

==Nominations==

LucaRoR ^(Talk) 20:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

1. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 20:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
2. Samonic ^(Talk) 20:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
3. Nicely done OOM 224 (he/him) 20:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
5. good stuff BloodOfIrizi^(Syndicure) 21:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
6. Definitely. Rsand 30 (talk) 21:04, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
7. Fan26 (Talk) 21:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
8. I nominate myself as the first to be on this :P Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 21:09, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
9. Lewisr (talk) 21:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
10. Hell yeah, more accountability to the community. :D Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 21:17, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
11. Seems like a no brainer Editoronthewiki (talk) 21:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
12. NanoLuuke^{Cloning Facility} 21:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
13. —spookywilloww^talk 21:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
14. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
15. This is the Way. But seriously though, I am all for giving more say to the community. —SnowedLightning (they/them) 21:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
16. Imperators II^(Talk) 21:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
17. 01miki10 ^{Open comlink} 21:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
18. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 22:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
19. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 01:21, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
20. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:56, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
21. CooperTFN (talk) 13:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
22. Seems straightforward! ℳÅℕ☉❂Ⅎ (he/him/his) 13:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Discuss