Forums > Consensus track archive > CT:K-8PO/Legends
This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was No consensus. Lewisr (talk) 04:20, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
The result of the debate was No consensus. Lewisr (talk) 04:20, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I would like to propose changing the infobox image used for the article K-8PO/Legends with the one I provided below. I think that the image that is currently being used should be changed to one in which K-8PO's face can be seen. I also think that an image of a higher resolution should be used. The image used for the canon article is suitable in my opinion, but it is from a canon source, so another has to be used for the Legends page. Gligo13 (talk) 15:18, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Option 1 (current image)
Option 2
Option 1
Option 2
- Gligo13 15:20, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- Rsand 30 (talk) 18:47, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- StarWarsFan327Talk 21:41, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- Good find, and I commend your initiative, but yeah, agree with what Bonzane said below. Imperators II(Talk) 09:58, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
- Yasen Nestorov (talk) 21:32, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
- Bonzane10
20:10, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
Discuss
- For future reference, CT is not necessary unless it's for a big/popular subject, like Luke Skywalker or Padmé Amidala for example. You could just make the change immediately as long as it is appropriate for smaller ones such as this. Bonzane10 16:13, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. I changed the infobox image in the article. Gligo13 16:29, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- Given that you've opened a CT up for it, we would need to follow procedure and reach consensus. My initial message was for your future reference regarding the topic should it ever happen again. Sorry for the miscommunication there! Bonzane10 16:39, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- Alright. My apologies for starting the consensus track. Gligo13 19:35, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
- Given that you've opened a CT up for it, we would need to follow procedure and reach consensus. My initial message was for your future reference regarding the topic should it ever happen again. Sorry for the miscommunication there! Bonzane10
- While I'm certainly not proposing actively obstructing a vote, I would say it might be prudent to allow this vote to reach no consensus so that infobox changes to a relatively minor and obscure character are not blocked by a need to reach a consensus threshold, especially given there isn't much of a debate on which infobox image is more suitable here. Granted, after two years the threshold would be irrelevant again and I doubt the infobox image would need to be changed again in that time given the character's aforementioned obscurity, but... still. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 05:23, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
- Option 2 seems like a huge improvement! Thank you for your contribution. Though as has been mentioned, a CT for this isn't really needed. It's best to hash these types of things out on the relevant talk page. CT's are for " organizing votes on site-wide changes, such as new policies and amendments to existing policy". Artemaeus-Creed (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- That should probably be rephrased, since Wookieepedia's policy does specify that image votes (where considered necessary; not to be held on talk pages) and (in all cases) animation and video uploading votes and Interactive Map usage votes are indeed to be held on the Consensus track despite only concerning specific articles. Imperators II(Talk) 15:06, 1 December 2025 (UTC)