Forums > Consensus track archive > CT:Good Article Nom Limit
This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Support proposal.
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Support proposal.
Relevant SH: Forum:SH:Good Article Nomination Limit
Pretty simple proposition: Increase the Good Article Nomination limit from 4 to 6.
Support
- As proposer. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 23:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 23:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- NBDani
(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 00:12, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- —spookywillowwtalk 00:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Fan26 (Talk) 00:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Lewisr (talk) 00:38, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:41, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Rsand 30 (talk) 00:48, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- The GAN was insanely productive in 2023, and I think the only real way to make 2024 beat it is to simply allow more nominations. Master Fredcerique
(talk) (he/him) 06:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Bonzane10
(holonet) 08:25, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- UberSoldat93
(talk) 09:28, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- LucaRoR (Talk) 10:54, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- OOM 224 (he/him) 11:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- ThrawnChiss7
Assembly Cupola 13:45, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- 01miki10 Open comlink 11:06, 10 December 2023 (UTC)