Forum:CT:Galactic Republic Character Infobox

Forums > Consensus track archive > CT:Galactic Republic Character Infobox

This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus Track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was an equipment section will not be added to character infoboxes. Green Tentacle (Talk) 16:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

I wanted to propose a "equipment" line be added to this template, and possibly the same to all other character infoboxes---CT-1987 13:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Add to TEMPLATES

  • CT-1987 17:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC) (Stricken per Forum:CT Archive/Single issue voters)
    • A character's eye color isn't (generally) going to change during their life. Their equipment is whatever they happen to have that day. How in the world would this be useful information or feasible to add to any infobox? 76.6.3.69 19:11, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Leave it be

  1. I'm afraid this is just going to clutter up the infobox and make it unnecessarily long. Also, what defines acceptable equipment infobox content? Something someone used three times? We have an "Equipment" section as outlined by the Layout Guide, which is more than enough for our needs. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  2. —Xwing328(Talk) 20:14, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  3. Just unnecessary. Chack Jadson (Talk) 23:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  4. Per Toprawa. Green Tentacle (Talk) 00:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  5. JMAS Hey, it's me! 00:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  6. Derp. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 00:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  7. It would clutter the info box to much.Sith Lord 1138 01:13, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  8. Cylka-talk- 01:24, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  9. Wookieepedia is not Databank. Mauser 07:55, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  10. This CT should be a CSD. The guy isn't even allowed to vote yet. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 08:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  11. As if my vote is really needed. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 15:05, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  12. Per what's been said above, except there's no reason why anyone can't start a CT, even if they're not an eligible voter. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 19:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
    • Why should they be able to start a CT if they havent worked on the Wook for the short amount of time it takes to get 50 mainspace edits? NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 16:09, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
      • Why shouldn't they? The Single Issue Voter policy is to prevent sockpuppets and meatpuppets interfering, not to deny new users an opinion on something or a right to suggest changes. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  13. Per NaruHina, as well as the anon up above. Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 20:05, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  14. IFYLOFD (Come with me if you want to live.) 23:12, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  15. Grunny (Talk) 23:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  16. Per Tope and Acky. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 04:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  17. Per Tope. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 13:36, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  18. MecenarylordEnter if you dare 13:52, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  19. Exercising my right to vote; yay for democracy! Also, it'll just clutter up the infobox. — beeurd talk 23:49, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Comments

In response to Naru's comments above (posting here, for clarity, etc.), the a CT forum is meant to be a discussion first and foremost, not a hasty vote, although it might not always seem this way. Not all CTs may even end up as a vote. While not everyone can vote right away, anyone can start a forum for discussion to float an idea. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)