Wookieepedia:Wookieepedian of the Month/August 2007

Nominations for August, 2007

Solus

Support

1. Same reasons. Darthchristian ^(Hey!) 19:12, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
2. JMAS 20:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
3. Great user! _supergeeky1 ^{The Cantina} 03:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
4. Skippy Farlstendoiro 08:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC) - Although I support Solus better than Greyman, I oppose to Imperialwalker's opposition, which I find out of place due to its lack of causes, as exposed by AdmirableAckbar et al.
5. Ditto Supergeeky!Tracynsenaar 16:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

1. Good user, but my vote's to Greyman this month. Hobbes15^{(Tiger Headquarters)} 17:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Greyman

Support

1. Jediknight19bby 14:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
2. AdmirableAckbar 18:13, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
3. If only for the GAs. Darth Seth ^{(Imperial Commander)} 18:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
4. Hell yeah.--Darthtyler ^{(talk) (HSM RKY)} 19:57, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
5. Jedimca0 ^{(Do or Do Not, There is No Try)} 20:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
6. Just because a person can be annoying doesn't make them un-worthy of this. This isn't the popularity award or the 2nd grade. TheNewDarthMalevlent^{(The Sith shall rise to power!)} 03:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
7. Very helpful with new users, often goes out his way to help them get accustomed to the site. Humbone 13:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
8. Absolutely deserving of this honor. Greyman never fails to provide effective feedback when needed and is a dedicated editor in every aspect of the wiki in which I have had the pleasure of working with him. If it weren't for him, I wouldn't have found my calling with GA's. --School of Thrawn 101 07:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
9. Most Defiantly. Joker1138^(Mandalore) 00:05, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
10. A very helpful bloke who deserves the recognition.--Goodwood 22:50, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
11. And never annoying in my experience. (And I hang out in IRC, so I don't use the phrase "never annoying" lightly.) Gonk ^(Gonk!) 14:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
12. LtNOWIS 23:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
13. An upstanding and courteous gent, to say the least. He never lets anyone get the better of him. - Graestan 02:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
14. QuentinGeorge 05:15, 7 July 2007 (UTC) - same reasons as last month
15. I approve of Greyman. That is all. π = 3 ^{(Talk to me, babe.)} 04:27, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
16. An excellent writer, editor, and very encouraging. Not that Solus isn't deserving of this award either, but Greyman has really impressed me all around. Keep up the good work. Atarumaster88 ^{(Talk page)} 03:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
17. Solus and Cull are both deserving as well, but Greyman is a phenomenal writer and a great all around user. For such a short time here, his edit count and amount of Featured and Good articles are ridiculous. I've got to vote for him. Hobbes15^{(Tiger Headquarters)} 17:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
18. Great work on dogfighting! MyNz 03:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
19. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 09:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
20. FA and GA extraordinaire! Chack Jadson 21:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
21. Jaina Solo^(Talk) 20:06, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
22. Slash Z 20:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
23. An outstanding Wookiepeedian. Ajrand ^(Signalbook) 20:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
24. ChrisPence 20:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
25. ^Jorrel _Fraajic 18:58, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Imperialwalker 20:14, 2 July 2007 (UTC) (banned)
   • reason? AdmirableAckbar 20:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
     • cause hes annoying. Imperialwalker 20:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
       • how so? AdmirableAckbar 20:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
       • he annoys me. Imperialwalker 20:26, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
         • i gathered as much. but what does he do to annoy you? AdmirableAckbar 20:29, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
   • check out Talk:Cheese. Imperialwalker 20:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
     • I can't find anything "annoying" there. --Jedimca0 ^{(Do or Do Not, There is No Try)} 20:44, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
       • Greyman simply told you that cheese appears in canon sources. then he wished you luck. what's the problem with that? AdmirableAckbar 20:49, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
   • Alright, sentients. Let our votes speak for themselves. - Graestan 20:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
     • This vote should be declared null and void. Chack Jadson 03:14, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments

• Uhhh, isn't Imperialwalker banned? It is probably for the best, judging from the mess above.Humbone 03:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Why haven't I voted for this guy before? Oh, that's right, I hadn't spoken with him yet. Anyone who hasn't met Greyman should stop by the IRC and talk to him. - User:Graestan/sig 23:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

• Canadian Military is a paradox of sorts, I'm sorry. User:PitchBrick 23:37, 25 July 2007 (UTC) (Personal attacks of anykind will not be tolerated, regardeless of how you word them). Greyman^(Paratus) 19:39, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Cull Tremayne

Support

1. --Eyrezer 07:34, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
2. Greyman^(Paratus) 12:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
3. Havac (Proxy vote)
4. Lord Oblivion^{Sith holocron} 03:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
5. Ben! Dagobah System! Thefourdotelipsis 08:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
6. Strong the force in this one is!Darth Nospher 11:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

• I think Cull well and truly deserves WOTM. He's been here almost two years and contributes both quantity and quality. He's done 15 FAs on a wide variety of topics. He also works as an Inq and an admin. Cull gets my vote! --Eyrezer 07:34, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• At 22:56, 4 July 2007...At the request of Havac: I am voting for him per discussion in IRC as he is unable to log in. Greyman^(Paratus) 03:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
• Cull will likely get my vote next time. Two admins in a row is not preferable to me. Gonk ^(Gonk!) 14:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I'll probably vote for Cull next time as well. I don't care if admins win- there's a reason they're admins, but I think Greyman really deserves it for his diligent work recently. Hobbes15^{(Tiger Headquarters)} 17:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

RushinSundaws

Support

1. Same reasons as last three nominations. -- Riffsyphon1024 20:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Darthtyler

Support

1. Darth Whatever 15:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC) (banned)

Oppose

1. This is not what I am looking for in WOTM. - User:Graestan/sig 15:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
2. same. And I question Darth Whatever's reasons for nominating him, as well as his judgement. TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar ^{(It's A Trap!)} 00:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
3. Not funny. Chack Jadson 01:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
4. Pathetic. π = 3 ^{(Talk to me, babe.)} 06:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
5. Sorry, but try to not have 60% of your edits on deleted pages. Jediknight19bby ^{(Jedi High Council Chambers!)} 00:46, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
   • What? TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar ^{(It's A Trap!)} 20:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
     • Check his edit count. His edit template says he has 9,000 edits, only 2,000, however, are on existing pages. Jediknight19bby ^{(Jedi High Council Chambers!)} 14:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
       • oh right, I understand your confusion. However, the template shows his edits on all wikia wikis, but the editcount only shows the ones on wookieepedia. TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar ^{(It's A Trap!)} 14:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments

he works hard. Darth Whatever 01:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC)