Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Temple of the Jedi Order (Real)

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.—Silly Dan (talk) 12:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Temple of the Jedi Order (Real) (talk - history - links - logs) and Temple of the Jedi Order (talk - history - links - logs)

Keep

Merge

Redirect

Delete

  1. Jediism, common?Herbsewell 00:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  2. SentryTalk 00:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  3. --ScwhinkyCommunicate File:Fettrockz.gif 00:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  4. See comments below. —Xwing328(Talk) 00:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  5. SFH 00:41, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  6. JMAS 00:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  7. Yes. --Ace of Aces 2.0Comm
  8. See comments below.--Goodwood 01:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  9. --Eyrezer 01:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  10. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 01:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  11. Come on... Sikon 12:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  12. Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  13. Darth Nospher 10:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  14. Thats when some fans think Star Wars is real and start a cult!MyNz 10:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  15. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 18:29, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  16. Scary NighthawkLeader 04:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  17. WTF. Joker1138(Mandalore) Neo-Crusader emblem
  18. You have LOST. Cutch 06:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

  • Direct copy violation from site. Could be considered offensive by some. Goes against any unofficial "keep religion and other sensitive issues off this site" agreement. —Xwing328(Talk) 00:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: If you vote to keep, please give a reason for it.--Herbsewell 00:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Duplicate - Temple of the Jedi Order. While not as much of a copy, everything on the page is straight off the front, merely with "We" changed to "They". —Xwing328(Talk) 01:02, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  • A waste of space, poorly written and formatted, and lifted right from the site. A simple summery of Jedism in general would suffice instead.--Goodwood 01:07, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Which we have but it's plagiarized.--Herbsewell 01:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
      • What exactly are we deleting now that the text has been removed?--Herbsewell 13:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
        • I think the VFD should apply to either version of the page: but if the result is "keep", they would be merged under Temple of the Jedi Order alone. —Silly Dan (talk) 19:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  • There is nothing wrong with having an article on them. They are certainly notable, whatever lame definition of that word is used around here. And regarding our non-religious policy, I believe that was in reference to user pages, which are inherently biased. As long as the article is written in NPOV, it has a place here. Of course, we would need some original writing. If those guys are religiously invested in this thing, they should jump at the opportunity to re-write the article with their own words. DarthMRN 17:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
    • But until then, we're deleting it.--Herbsewell 01:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)