Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/James Everett

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was to delete and merge with User:Coruscant.–Sentry Talk 07:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)



Contents

  • 1 James Everett (history - links - logs - delete - protect)
    • 1.1 Keep
    • 1.2 Merge & Delete
    • 1.3 Delete
    • 1.4 Comments

James Everett (history - links - logs - delete - protect)

Keep

Merge & Delete

  1. Move content to userpage. Per SFH below. Valin Kenobi 18:59, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  2. Jorrel Fraajic 19:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  3. The Broox 03:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  4. Yoshi626 03:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  5. SFH 03:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  6. Sure. - breathesgelatinTalk 15:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  7. I need a name (Complain here) 19:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  8. Ozzel 04:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
  9. Per SFH --Gurbiza 08:58, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
  10. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 18:22, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
  11. N.Y.N.E.Comlink 07:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Imp 21:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  2. Blast it. jSarek 21:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  3. SFH 21:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  4. This article is insignificant next to the power of... anything. Wildyoda 22:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  5. SentryTalk 23:34, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  6. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:27, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  7. Terminate it. Immediately. .... 03:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  8. Die, Jedi dogs! Cutch 21:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Comments

  • Entirely non-notable vanity article about the webmaster of a geocities.com page (his podcast site seems to be shut down [1]) --Imp 21:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete the article, but move the info into his userpage. -- SFH 21:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes, definitely. --Imp 21:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)



The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.