- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for rollback that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Xd1358 (11 admins + 13 users/0/0)
Two week deadline from first request, voting ends 11th of February, 2011.
Support
- Xd1358 is hard-working wookieepedian who is regularly doing more than his share on anti-vandalism work, and always ready to help and give guidance to the users in need. He is active on the maintaining side of the site, and his recent appointments to both AC and Inq is a good indicate of his eye for the article quality. I truly believe he, and we as community, would benefit from giving him a bit larger broom. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 23:21, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Very good candidate. Chack Jadson (Talk) 16:36, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Someone blow the shoo-in horn. This guy has been adminning to the best of his abilities without the sysops tools for long enough, let alone rollback. Graestan(Talk) 17:20, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Candy. Grand Moff Tranner
(Comlink) 17:21, January 29, 2011 (UTC) - Aye. —Xwing328(Talk) 18:03, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
- CC7567 (talk) 18:49, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Per Tm_T and Tranner. Master Jonathan
(Jedi Council Chambers) 19:58, January 29, 2011 (UTC) - He's polices articles and keeps them vandal-free left and right; there's no reason not to award him with the abilities to do that more efficiently. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 00:32, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Full support. Xd's headed places. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 01:27, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 01:30, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Grunny (talk) 09:35, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:13, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Xd's a good spirit.—Tommy 9281 13:21, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Cavalier One
(Squadron channel) 22:27, January 30, 2011 (UTC) - Surprised he doesn't have the spacemop already. ~ SavageBob 23:07, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
- IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 00:30, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
- JangFett (Talk) 01:06, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
- What?! That's not true! That's impossible! How can he not already have this?! MasterFred
(Whatever) 13:43, January 31, 2011 (UTC) - Absolutely. OLIOSTER (talk) 23:57, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
- -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 17:51, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Ready and deserving of increased responsibility. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:12, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
- NAYAYEN—it appears to be a frammistat 09:38, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Deserves it.--Station7 09:41, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
- LtNOWIS 01:54, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral
LRP;840 (Talk) 16:12, February 3, 2011 (UTC))(Vote struck, reason: Per policy: Less than 50 mainspace edits -- —Tommy 9281 Thursday, February 3, 2011, 16:18 UTC)
Optional candidate Q&A
- Why should you be granted rollback rights?
- So that I could revert faster? o_O I actually find myself undoing edits just to see that someone has already rollbacked it. I guess I could beat 'em with rollback. :D I am around quite a lot, just sitting there with the auto-refreshing RC on and checking almost every edit. Rollback is just a tool, IMHO, and it can't really hurt if there are more users with it. 1358 (Talk) 17:46, January 29, 2011 (UTC)