Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights/RFR archive/Trak Nar April 2009

< Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights | RFR archive
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for rollback that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Trak Nar (13 admins + 9 users/0/0)

Voting ends Friday, 24 April 2009

Support

  1. Upon viewing Trak's recent contributions to the site, I wholeheartedly believe she is more than deserving of the rollback tool. She makes copious amounts of edits, including more than her fair share, more than most users and many admins, of watching the recent changes and reverting baloney. She has also proven herself patient and more than civil with newbies, vandals, trolls, and other bad guys from mythology. Trak is good people. I haven't asked her what her views on candy are, though. Graestan(Talk) 04:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  2. I've heard that her views on candy are SPOILER. She still gets my vote. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 05:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  3. Grunny (Talk) 14:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  4. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 15:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  5. With even more examples of her tireless vandalism reverts. —CC7567 20px-Rex.png (s)talk 17:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  6. Per Graestan. Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 17:52, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  7. She should have earned her candy the first time. jSarek 20:39, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  8. Because sometimes Trak's the only one awake to rollback vandalism anyway ^_^ Enochf 21:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  9. Definitely shown herself to be a diligent RC patroller. - Lord Hydronium 22:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  10. She definitely puts in a lot of time and effort. Cylka-talk- 22:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  11. Per Enochf. Trak does the kind of Wookieepedia work I used to be able to do when I was unemployed. We need more diligent young people willing to forgo sleep for Wookieepedia. Darth Culator (Talk) 22:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  12. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 23:40, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  13. —Xwing328(Talk) 02:57, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  14. Very much support this nomination. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  15. Rodian candy! Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 15:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  16. LtNOWIS 04:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  17. Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 07:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  18. Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  19. Sure. Pranay Sobusk ~ Talk 17:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  20. Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  21. A very good user indeed. --Darth tom Imperial Emblem (Imperial Intelligence) 13:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  22. Trak is an exceedingly very good user who definitely deserves rollback, — RC-1136 Hate Mail Here 22:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Optional Question

  • Anywho... Why do I feel I deserve rollback rights? I'd really hate to use the hackneyed "To thwart vandals and trolls with greater ease!" but suffice to say, that is indeed one of the reasons. Also, if I come across something that needs rolled back during my Random Article edit sprees, I would be able to roll 'em back without bugging someone on the IRC as I usually do. I'm also usually hanging around here during the odd hours when most admins are about ready to go to bed. It can't hurt to have more people with Rollback Rights hanging around. It's like a forum with a sizable number of moderators; helps keep out the riffraff and make sure everyone is playing nice. Trak Nar Ramble on 04:46, 14 April 2009 (UTC)