- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for rollback that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Tommy9281 (12 admins + 16 users/0/0)
Two week deadline from first request, voting ends 1st of February, 2011.
Support
- Tommy is one of our most prolific users in terms of creating quality content, but scanning through his many edits also shows numerous undos and reversions of unhelpful edits. Tommy has been round the site since 2007, and in that time has become a true asset to Wookieepedia. He has written over 62 FAs and 29 GAs (!), and is a member of the Inq and AC. I believe Tommy is truly deserving of rollback, and it will only benefit the site to have such a tool in his hands. Grunny (talk) 02:47, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Absolutely. JangFett (Talk) 02:48, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Aye. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 02:49, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Positively. A dedicated user who is very deserving. :) CC7567 (talk) 02:49, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Though he deserves much more than candy, it's what Wikia provides. NaruHina Talk
02:51, January 18, 2011 (UTC) - Only natural. ~ SavageBob 03:22, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Per all above. Master Jonathan
(Jedi Council Chambers) 03:27, January 18, 2011 (UTC) - IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 03:34, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Candy. Grand Moff Tranner
(Comlink) 13:39, January 18, 2011 (UTC) - No doubt he's worthy. :) MasterFred
(Whatever) 13:45, January 18, 2011 (UTC) - Vote for the Sith! A truly deserving user. 1358 (Talk) 17:35, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- JMAS Hey, it's me! 17:53, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Tommy has for years now poured his sweat and blood (literally? :P) into making Wookieepedia a better place, and there are few users I would trust more with the advanced user privileges of this wiki than him. Absolutely deserving of this responsibility. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:12, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:45, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 21:33, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Per Grunny, Tranner, and Tope. jSarek 04:31, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. — Fiolli; 04:32, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Hell YEAH!!!—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 04:34, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Candy is bad for teeth, so let this be carrot instead. –Tm_T (Talk) 08:19, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
- This bandwagon isn't leaving without me! But yeah, Tommy's a great user. Trak Nar Ramble on 08:31, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Of course. I looked at this and said, "Holy shit, he doesn't?" Graestan(Talk) 02:34, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
- They said it. Chack Jadson (Talk) 17:11, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Knowledgeable, friendly user. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:37, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
- I can't believe that I only just noticed this. More limited powah for Wookieepedia's reigning Dark Lord. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 21:49, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Most definitely. —Xwing328(Talk) 18:02, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Sure. Bandwagon it is. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 06:11, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
- I'd thought he was an admin or something... —Obi–wan Jacobi (Talk) 09:31, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
- OLIOSTER (talk) 23:57, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral
Optional candidate Q&A
- Why should you be granted rollback rights?
- My primary goal with regard to Wookieepedia is and has always been the to serve the site wholeheartedly and preserve its integrity to the best of my ability. Patrolling recent changes has allowed me to serve the site in a particular capacity, because that is where untoward edits are exposed. While the ability to revert/restore unproductive edits is something that all Wookieepedians have, I believe rollback allows those who are able to undo unproductive edits more efficiently. For me, rollback isn’t a "right," but more of an honored duty; it's not a cane used to flog the mischievous, but rather a broom to sweep up that which was made untidy.—Tommy 9281 13:39, January 18, 2011 (UTC)