Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights/RFR archive/Farlstendoiro

< Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights | RFR archive
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for rollback that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Farlstendoiro (16 Users + 13 Admins/0/0)

Two week deadline from first request, voting ends May 27th.

Support
  1. Basically, Farl's a good egg. The guy's been a mainstay for longer than than you or I, and in my experience he's always been a very civil, very courteous user who is more than willing to help out. He's also working up a bit of frequency as a writer in the WP: Aliens cult, which is something I like to see, and he's also clearly got the best interests of the Wook at heart. I'm confident that he would use the fancy extra button as any other honourable rollbacker would, to combat evil and such. Also, why not? Thefourdotelipsis 01:34, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Of course. --Imperialles 01:36, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Skip to my Farlstendoiro.—Tommy 9281 01:37, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  4. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 01:38, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Good dude. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 01:39, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Had it coming for a long time. Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 01:41, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  7. "Why not?" is my guiding philosophy for granting rollback. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 01:58, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Per Culator. Grunny (talk) 02:36, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  9. JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 02:47, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  10. I have no objections. Havac 02:56, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  11. I'm actually surprised that he doesn't have such rights yet. Trak Nar Ramble on 03:38, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  12. Wait, Farl doesn't have rollback? How did that oversight happen?! Needs immediate correction. UPDATE: And Trak edit conflicts me with the exact same sentiment. More proof it needs to be fixed! jSarek 03:39, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  13. Fourdot sums it up pretty good. -- 1358 (Talk) 04:39, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  14. CC7567 (talk) 05:20, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  15. LtNOWIS 07:21, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  16. Seems like a grand idea. ~ SavageBob 07:24, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  17. Let's skip(py) the formalities. --Eyrezer 08:40, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  18. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 10:40, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  19. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 11:28, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  20. This many votes and no candy references? Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:50, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  21. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 18:19, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  22. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 18:34, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  23. Why not. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:17, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  24. Absolutely. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 19:42, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  25. Why not? Well, as long as he pledges to watch the RCs, particularly when his American friends are all still snug in their beds. Graestan(Talk) 20:47, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
  26. Absolutely, long time coming. Dedicated to working on all types of articles, big or small.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 02:24, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
  27. Per above. JangFett (Talk) 23:13, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
  28. —Silly Dan (talk) 00:34, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
  29. Lord Hydronium 00:45, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral
Optional candidate Q&A
Comments
  • Accepted via good old-fashioned talk page correspondence. Thefourdotelipsis 01:34, May 13, 2010 (UTC)