Wookieepedia:Inq/Eyes (information broker)

Wookieepedia > Wookieepedia:Inquisitorius > Inq/Eyes (information broker)

Eyes (information broker)

{{Fact}} tag in infobox
Article refers to the subject using masculine pronouns, despite the fact that it is in Category:Individuals of unspecified gender. This needs to be checked; if the character is indeed male, then the infobox, prose, and categories should reflect this, otherwise all masculine pronouns need to be removed from the article. —MJ— _{War Room} Tuesday, May 15, 2012, 01:38 UTC
- Looking at this again, I see that it says that he was usually referred to as male, though I don't think an encyclopedia should be copying what could be an error on other characters' parts. I still think the masculine pronouns should go. —MJ— _{Council Chambers} Saturday, May 26, 2012, 20:32 UTC
Also, do the quotation marks really belong in the title? I don't believe they should be there unless they are a literal part of his/her name, and the lead quote suggests that they aren't. —MJ— _{Council Chambers} Tuesday, May 15, 2012, 01:40 UTC
He's on this list of mine. See if any fixing needs to be done, and please edit my page reflecting this. Hanzo Hasashi 19:10, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Following Tope's cleanup, I just did some minor tidying. Should be good now. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 21:22, August 4, 2012 (UTC)

Placed on probation at Meeting 50. IFYLOFD ^{(Floyd's crib)} 00:29, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
FA status kept at Meeting 51. Menkooroo (talk) 02:02, August 7, 2012 (UTC)

Edited (see diff), moved to quotation-mark free title (though maybe Eyes (information merchant) would be better? He's not really a Rebel), original FA nominator notified. I'd also note that if Jabba Desilijic Tiure's article can use "he/him/his", a being of unknown gender who everyone assumes is male could do the same. —Silly Dan _(talk) 00:04, July 8, 2012 (UTC)
- The difference between Eyes and Jabba is that Jabba's gender is not unknown. It's established that Hutts are neither male nor female, but rather hermaphrodites, and as such, the policy on droids, which are also technically genderless, of using the canonically most common pronouns can easily be applied to Hutts as well. Eyes, on the other hand, is probably not genderless; (s)he is likely either male or female, and we shouldn't be assuming either way. —MJ— ^{Training Room} Sunday, July 8, 2012, 02:03 UTC
  - Point taken. I'll try to rephrase the article to further avoid pronouns by the time your next meeting rolls around (unless someone beats me to it.) —Silly Dan _(talk) 02:48, July 8, 2012 (UTC)