Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/WSB-15 sabotage droid

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

WSB-15 sabotage droid

  • Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: First of a droid class.
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 12:42, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
  2. ACvote JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 18:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
  3. —spookywillowwtalk 22:53, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
  4. LucaRoR Sigil of House Serenno (Talk) 14:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Commander Code-8 Hello There! 14:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Object

Spooky
  • From what I've seen in prior droid class noms, it might be good to change a lot of the "2" in the Characteristics section to spell out "two"? Along with the mentions of 8 and 10, given they're all relatively small numbers.
  • Is "improved" necessary for the infobox listing of it in the infobox? While it does make sense in the body, if it's improved compared to said other droid, that seems more like a prose thing rather than an addition necessary for the box as well.—spookywillowwtalk 17:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
UberSoldat
  • You've already made clear this information earlier in the intro. "...the intended purpose of the more basic WED-15 Treadwell models that the WSB-15 was physically identical to."
  • Let's see some relevant images in the body, including the BTS.
  • What's "cover" referring to here? "effectively as part of the droid's cover"
  • When you refer to "canon" in a Legends article, please make sure to specify that it applies to the Legends continuity as well. (Example). 03:53, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Fixed 1st, hopefully rewording explained 3rd better, and fixed 4th. As for the 2nd, only exactly 2 images of the WSB-15. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
      • Alright, I did get some images of WED-15 droids for use. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:33, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
  • ID isn't applicable here; these aren't alternate names of the subject, just descriptions. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 05:11, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments

  • Note that the reused Death Star background doesn't automatically mean that WED15-I7's necessarily on the Death Star IU, as cases such as The Star Wars Holiday Special reusing Death Star footage are proof it's not a duck test scenario. Also notably another angle for the same model is shown among a lineup of droids on the Death Star in the Death Star Owner's Technical Manual book, but there's no evidence it's the same droid. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
  • My copy-edit. Some of the things here could've been caught with another look through from your side. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 03:54, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 14:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)