Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Unidentified orbital security station (Ronika)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Unidentified orbital security station
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Unidentified orbital security station

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 18:00, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: WP:TotJ. I wonder if WP:AST could claim space stations, too.

(3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. Good work. Checked out clean to me. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 22:58, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Did a copy-edit and cleaned up some grammar errors and redundant wording. Looks fine to me. Trak Nar Ramble on 06:24, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Winterz (talk) 21:44, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ACvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 02:20, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:32, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 12:57, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
  7. ACvote JangFett (Talk) 16:20, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. Winterz
    • Article for the guard.
      • Created.
    • In the first quote, besides the guard involved, it indicates someone relevant enough for an article and slightly expansion here, considering that the individual (known as idiot :p) is stationed within the station. Also, the quote could be expanded to include his words as well.
      • That's just it, what's presented in the quote is all that is known about that conversation.
    • There are two pilots who are not being mentioned in the article ;)
      • Mentioned now. Imperators II(Talk) 20:53, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
    • Besides those little things, looks great. Note that linking in quotes isn't necessary if it's already linked in the body. Winterz (talk) 19:29, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 16:20, February 22, 2013 (UTC)


  • Actually Imperator, I don't think Stations are included in AST's scope. I mean, Astrography is about astronomical objects, and stations aren't such cases. Winterz (talk) 09:24, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
    • Yeah, I guess so. It's a shame, though. :P Imperators II(Talk) 09:27, January 28, 2013 (UTC)