- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Unidentified Sith Councilor (crystal vessel)
- Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 09:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:COMICS, WP:TOTJ
(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
- Thank you for the information — Samonic
08:48, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Nice. I've always loved the dramatic dialogue and crazy designs of these Sith Councillors. OOM 224 09:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)- LucaRoR
(Talk) 15:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
UberSoldat93 (talk) 18:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- I have some reserve regarding the placement of Mediacat, but since I've been told it's a global standardization issue, I guess it's fine for now. NanoLuukeCloning facility 11:47, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
1358 (Talk) 14:48, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Object
Unidentified Kilji councilor
Shouldn't the first image be on the article's left and the last one on the article's right?- Not necessarily, no. The important thing is just that they alternate sides.
Using "the Sith councilor" repeatedly is repetitive. Could you use something like "the Sith" or the "Sith male" at some point to remove some repetivenes? (And identify him as a male, of course)— Samonic18:16, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I do not believe that doing so would actually improve the article at all. Except for the Daragon twins, all of the characters mentioned in the article are Sith males. Note that I have actually already taken effort to vary the usage a bit where possible, referring to him as "(Sith) Councilor", "(Sith) Lord" and by the male pronoun "he". But at the end of the day, it's just one guy among many guys who all have the same attributes, and it's only their name (if applicable), appearance and actions that differentiate them. (And BTW, it's not mandatory to always explicitly say "male" if masculine pronouns do the trick.) Imperators II(Talk) 19:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 14:48, 28 May 2022 (UTC)