Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Tol Amn

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Tol Amn
    • 1.1 (2 ACs/3 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Cav
        • 1.1.2.2 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments
      • 1.1.4 Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

Tol Amn

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 04:04, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: for the barnburner

(2 ACs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Good job. 501st dogma(talk) 23:56, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 05:55, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ACvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 00:24, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 08:49, June 3, 2013 (UTC)
  5. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 00:30, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Cav
  • Generally, population information should be placed in the Description section. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 14:40, May 28, 2013 (UTC)
    • Moved. Imperators II(Talk) 18:06, May 28, 2013 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • I'm not sure if I'm being directly contrary to Cav's objection above, but we typically have never listed population figures in the Description section, per the LG. That info usually either goes into an "Inhabitants" section, or, in this case, considering it's basically indirect information pertaining to this planet, other status articles have just put that information directly into the History section, which is where I would suggest placing it instead. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:06, June 4, 2013 (UTC)
    • I wouldn't say contrary, but I am confused. My planet articles at the very least have always included population in the Description section, although it is generally repeated in an Inhabitants section if one is included, and I'm sure others follow the same route. Population isn't specifically mentioned in the LG, but since the majority of infobox info goes into the Description, then it makes sense to place it there. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 19:49, June 25, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

  1. ACvote Objections well over two weeks old. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 13:34, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 10:57, July 6, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:03, July 8, 2013 (UTC)