Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Tjulan Kwaad

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Tjulan Kwaad

• Nominated by: -- Harrar 14:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Another Kwaad for my collection

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

1. Dark Lord Trayus 03:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
2. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is a lie)} 08:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
3. Cylka^-talk- 01:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
4. Looks fine. —CC7567 ^(talk) 06:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
5. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 22:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
6. Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 23:53, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Object

1. Cylka:
   • What is the heresy that Mezhan Kwaad and Nen Yim committed? This needs a bit more context.
   • I believe a little context for villip would be beneficial for the uninitiated.
   • Nice article. Cylka^-talk- 01:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
     • Thanks. See what you think, I believe I've rectified matters. -- Harrar 14:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
2. You could use a little more context when first mentioning Onimi. As is, the "true power behind the Yuuzhan Vong" is a little confusing. Otherwise, nice work, Harrar. Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 22:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
   • Thanks Chack, I think I've belatedly addressed this. "Chack" it out. -- Harrar 22:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Comments

• If Tjulan is mentioned in the CSWE I would be very grateful if someone could transcribe the entry on mine or his talk pages. -- Harrar 14:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 11:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC)