Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/The Rakata and the Unknown World (second nomination)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

The Rakata and the Unknown World

• Nominated by: Goodmind (talk) 22:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: "Things to do" were done.
• Date Archived: 14:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
• Final word count: 356 words (84 introduction, 251 body, 21 behind the scenes)
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:NSW

(4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Imperators II^(Talk) 09:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
2. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
3. Lewisr (talk) 01:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
4. That trilogy was great.—spookywilloww^talk 21:27, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Object

ThrawnChiss7

• Release date is infobox exclusive. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 22:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Is it required to be in the intro? --Goodmind (talk) 22:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
    • I somehow didn't see it in the body, sorry. However, the infobox says "c." while the body indicates that it was released between the years without approximation. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 02:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
      • Fixed--Goodmind (talk) 23:04, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Imp

• Let's not have as an infobox image a picture that doesn't depict the article's subject at all, please. Imperators II^(Talk) 07:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Ok--Goodmind (talk) 23:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
• The mention of the New Sith Wars is intro-exclusive, can you incorporate that into the body as well?
  • Done--Goodmind (talk) 23:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
• The dating reference note should make it clear why the end of Revan's reign as a Dark Lord follows from his betrayal by Malak. Imperators II^(Talk) 10:04, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Is this enough? --Goodmind (talk) 23:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Why change the reference? Now it's even less clear --Goodmind (talk) 01:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
    • I don't see how it's not clear, sorry. Imperators II^(Talk) 09:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
      • Now we don't know why Revan is not a Dark Lord anymore in 3957 BBY --Goodmind (talk) 21:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
        • And we don't need to, not in that dating ref note. Imperators II^(Talk) 22:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
          • Why not? You asked to make it more clear? --Goodmind (talk) 22:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
            • Yeah, sorry about the confusion there. During my copy-edit I realized it could just be streamlined to only contain the info truly relevant to the dates. Imperators II^(Talk) 22:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 14:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC)