Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/The Hand of Thrawn

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 The Hand of Thrawn
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 CC-8
        • 1.1.2.2 Exiled Jedi
      • 1.1.3 Comments

The Hand of Thrawn

  • Nominated by: Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 08:36, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:How much information you can get out of a datacard that is ruined?

(3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. Trip391 (talk) 19:40, July 14, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Done. Great work. Commander Code-8 You lost the game! 10:29, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 20:03, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
    • Okay, this is scary. Are you reading my thoughts? It was not ten minutes ago, I was thinking about you and if I should ask you to give this another look...--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 20:05, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
      • Lol. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 20:08, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 13:40, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:07, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Inqvote Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 05:56, August 27, 2013 (UTC)
  7. ACvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 01:14, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object

CC-8
  • History section needs to start afresh from the intro.
    • Better?--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 10:44, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
  • I'd mention Thrawn in the intro somewhere
    • Done--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 10:44, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
  • "created at some point during Emperor Palpatine's rule" rule of what? (not two :P)
    • Fixed--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 10:44, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
  • Context for Nogrhi
    • Added--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 10:44, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
      • Little bit more needed, like that they were a species.
        • I think this has been handled.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 05:58, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • Reckon a pic of Thrawn wouldn't be out of place.
    • I was planning to do that, but apparently forgot. Thanks for reminding me. Added.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 10:44, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
  • Please say how the Caamas document caused a crisis
    • Did that do it?--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 10:44, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
  • Seeing a spot where the Hand of Thrawn isn't italicized
    • When used as a term it is not italicized, only when directly referring to the datacard.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 10:44, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
      • Where I'm seeing it is about the datacard.
        • Okay, I give up. You have to tell me, because I just can't find it. Unless you mean that lead in quote, but that is how it is in the novel.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 07:54, July 11, 2013 (UTC)
          • "the galactic government took steps to learn more about the Hand of Thrawn" I'm pretty sure its about the datacard here.
            • It actually is supposed to be about the term. Is it any clearer now?--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 05:58, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • "Corran Horn—a Rogue Squadron pilot and son-in-law of smuggler Booster Terrik—was sent to Errant Venture in hopes that Terrik would be familiar with the term" so is Terrick with them or not.
    • Say again? I'm not sure what is your problem with that sentence.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 10:44, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
      • I'm meaning was Terrik actually there with them on the Errant Venture.
        • Of course he was. It's his ship. Did that clear it up?--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 07:54, July 11, 2013 (UTC)
  • Context for the Sinister Triumverate
    • That enough?--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 10:44, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
  • Can you make the connection between the datacard and the fortress a bit clearer in the last paragraph?
    • Better?--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 10:44, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
  • I'll be back for more. Commander Code-8 You lost the game! 10:06, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks. I'm looking forward to it.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 10:44, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
  • Round II: "destroyed by ten years of exposure", exposure to what?
    • Elements.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 07:55, July 11, 2013 (UTC)
      • Mention it in the history as well pls.
        • Added.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 05:58, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • Could you try reworking the last intro sentence a bit, a few things are missing from there, like how the New Republic got the datacards, some context for the New Republic.
    • Better?--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 07:54, July 11, 2013 (UTC)
  • Context for the New Republic in the history. Commander Code-8 You lost the game! 01:28, July 11, 2013 (UTC)
    • Added.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 07:54, July 11, 2013 (UTC)
  • The intro has it mention the Leia is the New Republic boss and the next sentence gives context for the NR. I think it should be changed to say, "Organa Solo's government, the New Republic" or something similar
    • Better?--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 05:58, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • When repeating a character's name their last name should only be used.
    • It feels odd to call Lak Jit just Jit, but there you go.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 05:58, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • Can you add a bit more about why Leia was unnerved by the datacard's title? I'd mention that Thrawn nearly killed everyone in the galaxy or something.
    • As said on the lead in quote, Leia didn't understand her reaction either. So I added that.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 05:58, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
      • Still think that it should say what Thrawn did.
        • There.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 08:38, July 28, 2013 (UTC)
  • Context for the Errant Venture.
    • Added. You know, if this keeps up this unreadable datacard ends up knocking on the door of FAN...--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 05:58, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • Were the libraries at Bastion and that base in Yaga Minor Imperial affiliated, if so could that be mentioned
    • Added.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 05:58, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • Context for Admiral Pelleaon, and who was his peace initiative with.
    • There.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 05:58, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
      • Just chuck in that Pellaeon was an Imperial there pls.
        • Oops! I thought I said that already. Apparently I didn't. Fixed.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 08:38, July 28, 2013 (UTC)
  • And we need a first appearance template somewhere. Commander Code-8 You lost the game! 22:30, July 23, 2013 (UTC)
    • Ooopsie! Fixed.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 05:58, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • Pellaeon's information proved that theory wrong" what info? Commander Code-8 You lost the game! 07:16, July 28, 2013 (UTC)
    • Added.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 08:38, July 28, 2013 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • Could you make it clearer in the body of the article that the exposure to the elements corrupted the data? You make that clear in the intro, but leave it vague in the body.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 22:15, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
    • Done.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 05:55, August 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 02:58, August 29, 2013 (UTC)