Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Tangrene (species)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Tangrene (species)

• Nominated by: Eyrezer 11:05, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

1. I would like to see those redlinks killed though. IFYLOFD ^{(Floyd's crib)} 01:04, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
2. Good job Eyrezer. :P Kilson^{(Let's have a chat)} 11:55, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
3. I know a girl who blows her nose; she don't use tissue paper or any of those; she uses… ~Savage 15:57, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
4. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 15:59, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
5. I thought I already did support this. (: –Tm_T ^(Talk) 13:00, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

Object

• "Atrocity" is a little POV, isn't it? I understand the Atlas may call it such, cut per my current GAN, even sourced POV is not allowed unless it is IU. Other than that, I fixed some excessive comma use and a typo. Good article! MasterFred^(Whatever) 13:53, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
  • The "Imperial atrocities" map doesn't say whose point of view it's from, so I don't know if we can ever use it to source articles. I'd guess that 99.99% of anyone you'd ask would consider genocide an atrocity, but I've gone ahead and removed the statement. ~Savage 19:55, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks for handling that Bob. Apologies for the delay, MF. --Eyrezer 04:13, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
      • No, I'm sorry for the delay. I forgot all about this. Kilson reminded me on IRC. :P Anyway, I'm good. MasterFred^(Whatever) 19:43, June 21, 2011 (UTC)

Kilson

• Just one objection. Wouldn't the [[Category:Enslaved species]] fit here? Otherwise, nice job Bob! Kilson^{(Let's have a chat)} 20:27, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Who, me? There are others who write alien articles, you know. ;) ~Savage 22:21, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
    • Oh, oops. I mean Eyrezer. That's embarrassing. :P Haha Kilson^{(Let's have a chat)} 23:02, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
      • Added. And I'll take a review no matter what misconceptions it is labouring under! --Eyrezer 10:31, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Savaged…

• In the intro, it's ambiguous whether they were enslaved to construct the ubiqtorate, or as punishment for constructing the ubiqtorate.
  • Altered.
• Any reason to keep the post-genocide history in the article? It seems superfluous if the species is all gone.
  • I originally wrote this article without this information, for the reason that you state. However, it seemed remiss not to at least briefly mention it. If I was researching the Tangrene, I would personally find it useful to have these battles briefly mentioned, so I added it back in.
    • OK, I can see that. I still think it's not necessary, but I can see that it potentially has a place in the article. ~Savage 15:57, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
• Can you indicate in BTS that the OS doesn't indicate the plural form of the name? It could just as easily be "Tangrenes," but we don't know that for sure. ~Savage 22:21, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Done. --Eyrezer 10:31, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 19:58, June 21, 2011 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

1. Idle objection. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:05, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
   • I'm not sure where Eyrezer's gotten off to of late, but I'll take over the nom until he gets back. ~Savage 19:55, June 17, 2011 (UTC)