- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Swamp pickle
- Nominated by: —Axinal Convocation Chamber 02:35, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: I learned something new today: Michael Reaves wrote for Ewoks.
(5 ACs/2 Users/7 Total)
Support
- Kilson(Let's have a chat) 10:45, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Just create the article for the family cure. MasterFred
(Whatever) 16:43, April 14, 2011 (UTC) 
Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:43, April 14, 2011 (UTC)- The image is strangely disturbing ... or I have a filthy, disturbed mind. - Cavalier One
(Squadron channel) 12:11, April 15, 2011 (UTC) - Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 18:21, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Snowball this beeitch. And yes, Cav, you have a filthy, filthy mind :P—Tommy 9281 Friday, April 15, 2011, 23:57 UTC
- Snowballed! 1358 (Talk) 08:09, April 16, 2011 (UTC)
Object
Kilson
I would mention that Wicket and his friends traded the pickles for Mooth in the Intro.Added.
You need to create a Sources section and put A Star Wars CELibration in it.- I don't believe so, since the swamp pickle itself is never mentioned in the magazine (I'm assuming here, as the episode summaries are limited really to just one or two very unspecific sentences; I will, of course, double check the magazine to be sure).
- I brought up quite the opposite objection one of TK-999's GANs, which used sources that never mentioned the subject in question. I couldn't find the exact quote in the Manual of Style or Layout Guide, but I'm under the impression that the Sources section was basically an encyclopedic version of the Appearances section, and that only sources which feature, mention, or indirectly mention the topic in question should be included. I don't believe I'm wrong about this, but if someone (preferably an AC or Inq) could reassure me, I'd be much obliged.
- No, you are correct. I was under the assumption that the article was using the pickle by name. If it doesn't, don't put it in the Sources list.
- I brought up quite the opposite objection one of TK-999's GANs, which used sources that never mentioned the subject in question. I couldn't find the exact quote in the Manual of Style or Layout Guide, but I'm under the impression that the Sources section was basically an encyclopedic version of the Appearances section, and that only sources which feature, mention, or indirectly mention the topic in question should be included. I don't believe I'm wrong about this, but if someone (preferably an AC or Inq) could reassure me, I'd be much obliged.
- I don't believe so, since the swamp pickle itself is never mentioned in the magazine (I'm assuming here, as the episode summaries are limited really to just one or two very unspecific sentences; I will, of course, double check the magazine to be sure).
This isn't an objection, but given how the redlink rules are slowly getting stricter and stricter, I would recommend creating a small article for "family cold cure".- Sure, I'll work on that later today. I don't expect you to strike this until I do, of course.
- It's not an objection, I trust you will do it. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 22:38, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll work on that later today. I don't expect you to strike this until I do, of course.
- That's all I have, nice job. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 04:03, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Kilson. BTW, this was originally under Support; I assumed these were objections and moved them down to Object.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 10:13, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh....oops. Sorry about that, and thanks for moving it.
- Thanks for the review, Kilson. BTW, this was originally under Support; I assumed these were objections and moved them down to Object.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 10:13, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 08:09, April 16, 2011 (UTC)