Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Rakata Prime

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Rakata Prime

  • Nominated by: TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 07:41, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The article now exceeds 250 words, so I nominate it for good article status this time. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 07:41, February 10, 2017 (UTC)

(1 ACs/5 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 21:29, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 00:39, February 15, 2017 (UTC)
  3. I could live there for my retirement.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 12:45, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Sol PacificusFirestorm 07:50, April 4, 2017 (UTC)
  5. ACvote One sentence GAs... Imperators II(Talk) 08:01, May 23, 2017 (UTC)
  6. --Lewisr (talk) 14:38, June 1, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ecks Dee
  • Please include a backup link for reference 8. The citation template in question seems to support |archiveurl=. 1358 (Talk) 20:53, August 10, 2017 (UTC)
    • I can't believe how I missed that, done! TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 09:58, August 11, 2017 (UTC)
  • The Bts covers some completely irrelevant information. Information about the Rakata species appearing in Canon has no relevance to the planet. 1358 (Talk) 21:02, August 11, 2017 (UTC)
    • Information removed. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 12:15, August 12, 2017 (UTC)
      • The article currently stands at 245 words. Unless you can find a way to make it 250 without fluffing it up, this article is ineligible for GA status. The second paragraph of the Bts is still a bit too long and could be better structured. 1358 (Talk) 21:33, August 12, 2017 (UTC)
        • Speaking to what ecks is saying, there's a lot of wordiness in that BTS that I know could be worded more succinctly, so it's pretty unthinkable to me that anything could actually be added to this article to reach 250. This nomination will be eligible for removal in three days from now due to this unaddressed objection, though I would suggest the nominator give us the ok to just remove it now. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:26, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
          • I will spend some time smoothing the BTS, but as you said, there is no way it could reach 250. So please go ahead. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 20:38, August 24, 2017 (UTC)

Comments