Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/R2-D7

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was removed. Please do not modify it.

R2-D7

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:59, September 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Original nomination can be found here.

(2 ACs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 02:47, October 13, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Imperators II(Talk) 16:09, October 19, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:22, October 22, 2017 (UTC)
  4. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 21:38, October 24, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imp2-D7
  • OK, now let's see some sectioning. Imperators II(Talk) 22:06, October 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Please expand the intro. You can probably add something from both the Bio and Characteristics.
  • Pablo Hidalgo is going to need some context.
  • I feel like the last sentence of the BTS should be reworded. What may or may not be explained by what should be left up to the reader, you should just state who said what. Also, I think the last paragraph of BTS is more important than the second one and therefore the two should be switched (the second paragraph actually feels somewhat connected to the last paragraph, maybe you can link the two in your wording). Imperators II(Talk) 18:35, October 13, 2017 (UTC)
    • How does this look? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 05:30, October 19, 2017 (UTC)
      • Actually, I'm no longer convinced the second paragraph of the BTS is really necessary at all. I don't really see where in the referenced source does it say that "R2-D7" is a designation of an R2-series astromech droid, and, given Hidalgo's Insider comment, I don't think we should be assuming that droids with "R2" in their names are necessarily R2-series. Imperators II(Talk) 08:18, October 19, 2017 (UTC)
        • Removed, but we're now back beneath the CA word limit. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:01, October 19, 2017 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • Any reason why the IDA isn't located at Inventory Droid Assistant and referred to as such in the intro? Reader doesn't know what I.D.A. stands for.
    • I'll fix that. Would you mind moving the page to that redirect? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:39, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
  • Tomorrowland Starport's astrographical location is probably worth mentioning (Earth system?) 1358 (Talk) 19:49, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
    • Can't find anything substantiating that info. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:39, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
  • Is it really fair to call 4.3 ABY a year? It's like saying "in the year 2017.10" when you refer to October 2017. 1358 (Talk) 21:19, October 24, 2017 (UTC)
Fred strikes back
  • Where are you getting the information about the droid's action figure being a repaint of another droid's action figure? MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 09:01, October 26, 2017 (UTC)
    • Because, well, it is. Aside from the colors, they share the exact same mold. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:17, October 26, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • By my count, the article currently sits at 228 words. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:34, October 26, 2017 (UTC)
    • That indeed seems to be the case. Would you like me to remove the nomination so that you can take it to the CAN? 1358 (Talk) 18:12, October 26, 2017 (UTC)