Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/R2-D7

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 R2-D7
    • 1.1 (2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Imperators II
        • 1.1.2.2 Ayrehead
        • 1.1.2.3 Exiled Jedi
      • 1.1.3 Comments

R2-D7

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 07:18, September 4, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The victim in a long-running case of mistaken identify.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 07:48, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:13, September 15, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 21:08, September 17, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Blog backup link!
    • Added. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:48, September 5, 2017 (UTC)
  • EndorExpress backup links!
    • Added. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:51, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
  • Could you specify that the Droidnostics Center was on Tomorrowland Starport?
    • Added. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:49, September 5, 2017 (UTC)
  • I think the BTS quote is redundant, since it's non-narrative text, information from which you have completely covered in the article.
    • Removed. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 14:51, September 4, 2017 (UTC)
  • "with a black photoreceptor and white plating, with a silver and teal trim." — do you think you can reword this so that it doesn't start with "with" twice in a row? Imperators II(Talk) 08:30, September 4, 2017 (UTC)
    • Changed. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 14:51, September 4, 2017 (UTC)
  • Please redeco the BTS. Imperators II(Talk) 19:58, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
    • By that I mean please rewrite the BTS so that it's clearer, less convoluted, doesn't use parentheses, and has a paragraph break. (Look at it in the Oasis skin, it needs to be broken up). Also, can you substitute "redeco" for something that's in dictionaries? Imperators II(Talk) 19:58, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
      • Split and rewrit. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:14, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
        • Surely you can't source the information about R4-M9's Power of the Jedi figure to R2-D7's Star Tours figure? Imperators II(Talk) 07:32, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
          • Updated reference. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 07:36, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • It seems to be operating the track control in the image, is this worth mentioning? Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:32, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
    • Added. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:07, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
  • I haven't much experience with Star Tours articles, but is referencing the entire first BTS paragraph just to the Star Tours article really the best reference available? Surely something that has the dates and locations written in print would be better at the very least. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:32, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
    • If there is an official source, I have yet to find it. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:22, September 12, 2017 (UTC)
      • Is there not at least a photo or something of the poster? Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:12, September 14, 2017 (UTC)
        • It's been in the External links section the entire time, but I had never thought to actually cite it. Added. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:18, September 14, 2017 (UTC)
          • Could you also source the date? Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:26, September 14, 2017 (UTC)
            • Could you be more specific? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:29, September 14, 2017 (UTC)
              • You currently source the year the ride opened just to the ride itself but there's got to be a better source like the complete guide or something. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:46, September 14, 2017 (UTC)
                • Added. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:43, September 15, 2017 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • The citation for the date needs additional explanation for why it can be used to source the date for the droid. Since nothing in the reference mentions the droid, it cannot be used by itself.
    • Fixed. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:39, September 24, 2017 (UTC)
  • The BTS needs to mention the droid's similarity in appearance to the R4-series agromech droid. You might be able to make the argument that it is not confirmed to be an R4 droid, but you should at least note that it looks similar.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 01:57, September 18, 2017 (UTC)
    • Added. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:39, September 24, 2017 (UTC)
  • After these changes, the word count of the article is at 260. Just leave a comment asking for this article to be archived and this nomination can be archived.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 18:44, September 30, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • Do you think there's enough evidence to assume that this guy is a part of the R-series? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:51, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
    • What evidence is there? Just the R2 part in its name? Imperators II(Talk) 19:58, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
      • Yeah, TCSWE just calls i something along the lines of a "conical-headed astromech droid". - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:16, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
        • Yeah, better not to assume it, then. Imperators II(Talk) 20:20, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
          • Yeah, you're probably right. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:26, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
  • Per above, please archive this nomination. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:01, September 30, 2017 (UTC)