Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Mollusk arches

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Mollusk arches
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Fan
        • 1.1.2.2 Lew
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Mollusk arches

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 12:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 06:51, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 394 words (51 introduction, 202 body, 141 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote Fan26 (Talk) 19:59, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 00:45, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 22:48, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
  4. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 01:27, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
  5. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 06:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Object

Fan
  • The article for the Tessents has a link to the Alsakan Tessent and a redlink for the other one, so it seems the mentions of both in the BtS should have links? Fan26 (Talk) 15:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
    • Not sure what you're saying here. The last sentence of History links to both the general concept of Tessent and the two specific Tessents. Imperators II(Talk) 18:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
      • Huh, missed that the specific Tessents were linked to. Fan26 (Talk) 19:59, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Lew
  • Anything that could be put into the type field? Lewisr (talk) 22:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
    • Nope. Imperators II(Talk) 06:20, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 06:51, 13 June 2023 (UTC)