Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Mishru

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Mishru

  • Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast (talk) 08:40, February 21, 2020 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Promised myself the article wouldn't go over 250 words, but here we are.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Fan26 (Talk) 16:40, March 4, 2020 (UTC)
  2. ACvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:10, March 5, 2020 (UTC)
  3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:01, March 7, 2020 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:15, March 10, 2020 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 22:07, March 10, 2020 (UTC)

Object

UberSoldat
  • "...and robbed passerby in the streets". Is "passerby" supposed to be plural in this context? UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:50, February 24, 2020 (UTC)
  • As per Keffan's nomination, Crucival being located in the Outer Rim needs a ref note. UberSoldat93 (talk) 16:47, March 4, 2020 (UTC)
Imp
Anil
  • In the Biography, could you please add more context for Crucival and how various factions on it were at war with each other? You briefly do that in the intro by saying that he "fought for at least one of the competing factions on Crucival," something short like that should be enough. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 09:20, March 5, 2020 (UTC)
    • I've further expanded upon it on the last section of the first paragraph. Braha'tok enthusiast (talk) 16:32, March 5, 2020 (UTC)
Tommy
  • I don't think that date note works. What I'm getting is that Namir joined the 61st two months before Yavin, so 0 BBY, but you only say "Namir joined the Sixty-First after the Battle of the Tower". That could be over 10 months after, meaning that battle didn't necessarily take place in 0 BBY.
    • He joined a week after the tower fell. I've implemented it now.
      • I've rewritten the date note to make it simpler and more concise. Please make sure you're happy with it and that that info can come from Twilight Company.
  • If the 61st took part in the Battle of the Tower, I think that should be mentioned earlier.
    • Done.
  • "After losing his master, Mishru hid his brand, a symbol of his former faction" I think you should briefly mention how Mishru was in a faction and had a master before this, before moving on to how he lost them.
  • "who fought for at least one of the competing factions" This seems a bit odd, perhaps you could really briefly detail the bit about being in a faction and losing his master here instead?
    • (For the one above too) It only says he lost a master, nothing about being in a faction. Should I assume that he was in a faction? Braha'tok enthusiast (talk) 21:34, March 6, 2020 (UTC)
      • I don't think you should assume that. It could be like a slave thing, or an apprenticeship. If it doesn't directly mention a faction in regard to that, I wouldn't assume.
  • Would it be appropriate to mention the brand in equipment?
    • It's technically a tattoo right? Otherwise it'd be rubbed off. So I don't think that would count.
      • Ah I did not interpret it that way. Nope, that's fine then. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 16:26, March 9, 2020 (UTC)
  • Do we have anything to build a P&T section? The pickpocketing maybe could be included, although not on its own. Can you think of anything else that could go there? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 21:01, March 6, 2020 (UTC)

Ayrehead

  • I feel Namir's band could probably have an article, which should also be included in the infobox. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:15, March 10, 2020 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 22:07, March 10, 2020 (UTC)