Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Kubindi

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Kubindi
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Ayrehead
        • 1.1.2.2 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Kubindi

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:20, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: From a Certain Point of View has a way of messing up my status articles.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Reviewed via IRC. Imperators II(Talk) 23:13, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  2. —Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 12:45, February 13, 2018 (UTC)
  3. Jinzler (talk) 20:46, February 20, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:41, March 11, 2018 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Your non-working Archive links and I haven't seen the last of each other, AV. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:17, March 19, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Per your own dating ref, you should say by approximately 2 BBY or something similar. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:14, February 23, 2018 (UTC)
    • Done. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 23:56, February 26, 2018 (UTC)
  • Also I don't follow your reasoning as to why they had been led to believe the Alliance were sabotaging them by the time of the founding of the Alliance. Surely it should be that they were led to believe this after the founding of the Alliance? Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:14, February 23, 2018 (UTC)
    • Should I use "as early as approximately 2 BBY"? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 23:51, March 3, 2018 (UTC)
      • I'd have something like "However, at some point following the founding of the Alliance to Restore the Republic in approximately 2 BBY, the Empire deceived the species into believing that the Alliance was the responsible party for the sabotage. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:59, March 4, 2018 (UTC)
        • Done. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:11, March 11, 2018 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • I think the social media policy should necessitate the removal of the 2 BBY date, which is sourced to Pablo's tweet. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 06:53, March 12, 2018 (UTC)
    • Ezra's age of 17 at the beginning of Season 3 can be cited to http://disneyxd.disney.com/star-wars-rebels, if we need to develop a new dating ref without the Tweet. We'll just need to do more "simple maths" in the note itself. I've already backed up the link. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 15:42, March 12, 2018 (UTC)
      • That's what you should source this to, then. Not Pablo's tweet. We should be avoiding social media references whenever possible. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:11, March 12, 2018 (UTC)
        • How does that look? Also, do you know if we could get the Disney XD website added to our existing Disney template? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 04:36, March 16, 2018 (UTC)
          • The Disney template already accommodates subdomains, so I've introduced it to the reference. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:54, March 19, 2018 (UTC)
  • The backup links for the SW.com news articles are not working. You will need to find an earlier archived version. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:01, March 17, 2018 (UTC)
    • Fixed. Also added a backup link for the Databank. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 15:59, March 18, 2018 (UTC)
      • Everything appears to be working except for the Force Collection announcement. That template is attempting to use a September 2017 archive version, which understandably doesn't work, since most SW.com links from approximately late summer 2017 to present are not working. You'll need to find an earlier archive version to use there. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:54, March 19, 2018 (UTC)
        • I've fixed this for you, AV, as well as the formatting for Databank citations. Imperators II(Talk) 19:39, March 19, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 20:17, March 19, 2018 (UTC)