Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Karjj

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Karjj

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 17:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: MY FAVORITE BAD DECISIONS CROC
  • Date Archived: 04:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 769 words (101 introduction, 441 body, 227 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 717 words (104 introduction, 386 body, 227 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:GE

(4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 02:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 02:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 04:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • You describe the journal as being around the same time as Galaxy's Edge in the intro, but 34 ABY is only the earliest point it could be so it could take place much later. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Good catch.
  • I'm not sure if there's precedent for this, but how would you feel about having just Married in the partners field of the infobox? Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
    • That wouldn't work - in contrast to cases like starship articles where we might say something like "Hyperdrive - Equipped", saying "Partner(s) - Married" doesn't really make sense.
  • Precdent for the Batuu Bounty Hunter's game is to mention the player finding the target hidden in Black Spire, see Karoon Bogat and AL1-L3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Added, hope you don't mind me lifting the wording from the latter. Imperators II(Talk) 11:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
  • I'd probably specify that he owned the starship around 10 BBY so as to not confuse it with the one he's accused of stealing. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Fair.
  • Picture only is only used for sources. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
    • That's a practice I'll have to disagree when it comes to these books that combine text with illustrations in more-or-less comparable amounts. I feel it is important to distinguish when something is featured in just one of those storytelling modes and not the other, same what we're doing with Po tags in Sources. Imperators II(Talk) 11:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
      • Striking since I agree in principle and don't think this is the place to establish this, although this'd probably need to be codified somewhere since to my knowledge we treat being pictured in any appearance as a full appearance, which makes sense for comics and such. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 04:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)