- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Jedi romance
- Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 09:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
- Date Archived: 21:29, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Final word count: 286 words (65 introduction, 166 body, 55 behind the scenes)
- Word count at nomination time: 289 words (65 introduction, 166 body, 58 behind the scenes)
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:ENT, WP:THR, WP:Novels
(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
Wok142 (talk) 16:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)- CometSmudge (talk) 01:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Lewisr (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
-
Missing information on Avar Kriss and Elzar MannOOM 224 (he/him/they) 17:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC) 
Per OOM. Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 18:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Object
Dani
I dislike the use of "X was created for Y" without a source. We know authors and LFL in general recycle unused material in future products, Voorpak for example. NBDani(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 18:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)- Sure, except in this case before appearing in the novel the subject appeared in a preview of the same novel. So I'm not seeing the problem here (as was potentially the case where a subject first appeared in some form of adaptation of a larger work). Imperators II(Talk) 06:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- First mentioned/appeared works here absolutely. My issue is saying the concept was created *for* LOTJ. When for-all-we-know the author recycled the concept from an earlier work it wasn't used in. NBDani (they/them)Yeager's Repairs 10:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Again, though, I understand that concern when a subject appears in different works or even different types of media. Here, on the other hand, we have no evidence that the subject may have been reused, and assuming it could have been here feels like a stretch to me; it feels too assumptive and failing Occam's razor. Imperators II(Talk) 14:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- First mentioned/appeared works here absolutely. My issue is saying the concept was created *for* LOTJ. When for-all-we-know the author recycled the concept from an earlier work it wasn't used in. NBDani
- Sure, except in this case before appearing in the novel the subject appeared in a preview of the same novel. So I'm not seeing the problem here (as was potentially the case where a subject first appeared in some form of adaptation of a larger work). Imperators II(Talk) 06:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)