Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Jean-Luc Picard

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Jean-Luc Picard

  • Nominated by: Thefourdotelipsis 00:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Engage...?

(3 ACs/10 Users/13 Total)

Support

  1. CC7567 (talk) 06:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. I planned to nominate it myself sometime, but oh well.. QuiGonJinnThere's always a bigger fish. 09:15, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
  3. Make it so! Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 10:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
  4. ACvote When you were talking about this in IRC, I was hoping you were kidding. :p Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 11:06, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
  5. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 11:14, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
  6. ACvote "There … are … four … lights!" Graestan(Talk) 01:47, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
  7. lol, good to go... –Victor Redstarbird (talk page) 08:24, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
  8. We need to get this to 1000 words somehow. IFYLOFD (You will pay the price for your lack of vision!) 16:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
  9. Someone should do Xenomorph as well --Jinzler 21:02, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
  10. As a huge fan of both Star Wars and Star Trek, I support this, although it is a bit weird for an article about Picard to appear here :P. OLIOSTER Sith Emblem 19:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
  11. I've never seen a single Trek in my life - Jean would be ashamed of me. :( --Darth tom Imperial Emblem (Imperial Intelligence) 20:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
  12. Whaaaaaaa? JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 20:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
  13. Inqvote "The line must be drawn here! This far, no further! And I will make them pay for what they've done!" Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:07, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. Xicer
    • "After having suffered at the hands of the Borg, and endured many adventures with his crew on the Enterprise-D..." 'Endured' should be changed to 'enduring'
    • The page that currently links to 'Borg' is not the same Borg being talked about in the article. The link should either be removed or a new article on the Borg should be created.
      • Fixed.
    • "The Enterprise-D was the flagship of Starfleet." This sentence seems kind of thrown in there randomly. It should be reworded to flow better with article, or given better placement.
      • Tweaked.
    • "In his spare time, he would practice being a musician." Shouldn't this be in the P&T?
      • No, because it's not a part of his personality. It's a hobby.
    • Otherwise, very nice. Brilliant timing too! Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 01:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. Floyd:
    • Contextify the Borg in the intro.
      • I'm afraid I can't do that, since all that's given in the article is that he's "a victim of the Borg."
    • "Flunked out" Rather colloquial.
      • Tis. Changed.
    • Contextify Starfleet.
      • Done.
    • I'm not gonna lie, this is awesome. Good job. IFYLOFD (You will pay the price for your lack of vision!) 01:52, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
  3. Attack of the Clone
    • Are the refs really needed? There's only one source.
      • Not needed, but just a personal thing that I choose to do. Makes things easier if another source pops up, or I need to cite something in the BTS at some stage.
    • Per Floyd; context isn't necessary for everything, but it would be nice to know what Starfleet was and what the Borg were.
      • See above.
    • Who were Riker and Geordi? Context is given for everyone else in that sentence, so it's a bit confusing.
      • Same story, basically, they're given no context in the source.
    • Excellent work. CC7567 (talk) 02:43, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 00:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)