Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Hem Dazon

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Hem Dazon
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/3 Users/7 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Zed
        • 1.1.2.2 Imp
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Hem Dazon

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:15, October 13, 2020 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Felt like a break from Galaxy's Edge for some old school cantina goodness

(4 ACs/3 Users/7 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 18:24, October 13, 2020 (UTC)
  2. LordMominutiae (talk) 01:21, October 17, 2020 (UTC)
  3. My vote is redundant, but I'll be polite :P Zed42 (talk) 23:53, October 20, 2020 (UTC)
  4. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 19:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
  5. ACvote MasterFredCommerce Guild(talk) 06:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
  7. ACvote Imperators II(Talk) 10:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Object

Zed
  • P&T mentions his skin color twice.
  • The long list of authors for Absolutely Everything You Need to Know can be removed. Zed42 (talk) 10:43, October 13, 2020 (UTC)
    • Both fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:41, October 13, 2020 (UTC)
  • His gender should be explicitly mentioned somewhere in the body. Zed42 (talk) 18:13, October 13, 2020 (UTC)
    • Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:31, October 13, 2020 (UTC)
Imp
  • I realize the "which includes" in "the events of Star Wars: Episode IV A New Hope prior to the Battle of Yavin, which includes Hem Dazon's appearance, to 0 BBY" refers to ANH, not the Battle of Yavin, but is there any way for you to reword this so that there's no grammatical ambiguity? Imperators II(Talk) 19:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
    • Re-worded, how does it look now? Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:18, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
      • Eh, the grammatical ambiguity is kind of still there ("events [...] which include(s) Hem Dazon's appearance [...]" vs "ANH, which include(s) Hem Dazon's appearance [...]") but I'm hoping the change "includes" -> "include" solves this adequately.
  • Uh, I'm not really seeing the benefit of having different sourcing for infobox and the body. Imperators II(Talk) 09:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
    • Fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:13, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 10:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC)