Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Green Squadron pilot (Battle of Endor)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Green Squadron pilot (Battle of Endor)

  • Nominated by: Graestan(Talk) 19:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: "Copy, Gold Leader." Graestan(Talk) 19:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

(4 ACs/3 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  2. ACvote On the proviso that any extra sources that may contain the character are added. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 10:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:08, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  4. Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 21:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  5. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 23:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  6. ACvote I have faith that Grae will find all necessary sources and add any and all new info into the article. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 23:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
    • I doubt the last two things I have to check have anything aside from {{Imo}}, judging by the rest of the sources I have seen. But I will check them nonetheless. Graestan(Talk) 00:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
  7. Inqvote — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 15:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. From the Moffship of Grand Moff Tranner:
    • This pilot appears in the novelization of ROTJ, and there's some interesting info that should be added to the BTS. I have the novel in my hand if you need it.
    • And, of course, he's probably appeared in a ton of other places. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 20:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
      • On it. Thanks for pointing this out to the blissfully uninitiated; movie characters suck. Graestan(Talk) 22:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
  2. Any way to link Starfighter combat in there?--Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 01:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
    • That's not a rule-based objection. Feel free to do it yourself, but please don't make more than minor, objective changes in doing so. Graestan(Talk) 06:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

  • No, this really isn't Jake Farrell. At least, not thus far, and probably never, at this rate. Graestan(Talk) 19:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)