Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Gampassa

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Gampassa
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Exiled Jedi
        • 1.1.2.2 Mekhagodzilla'd
        • 1.1.2.3 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Gampassa

  • Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:08, January 29, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: For the barnburner. Failed CAN due to word count.

(3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. Supporting based on previous CAN review. Nice work. ~SavageBOB sig 19:00, February 4, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:16, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
  3. --LelalMekha (talk) 21:58, February 10, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 07:28, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 21:02, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:08, February 20, 2014 (UTC)
  7. ACvote grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 09:43, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Exiled Jedi
  • Could you mention the region that Glee Anselm was located in?
    • Already said to be in the Mid Rim in the body.
      • Oops, I missed that...--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 07:28, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
  • In the intro, the way the length is specified makes it sound like they were all that length.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 15:59, February 10, 2014 (UTC)
    • Changed. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 21:36, February 10, 2014 (UTC)
Mekhagodzilla'd
  • Same objection as Exiled Jedi's second one: we can't be sure it was normal for the whole species to grow that big, can we? I mean, are we sure they measured 2,274 meters long on average? Wouldn't it be safer to say that "at least one specimen grew up to be reach 2,274 meters?" --LelalMekha(talk) 20:15, February 10, 2014 (UTC)
    • Addressed the objection. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 21:36, February 10, 2014 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • The BTS states "Notably, the species' plural form was never established by the sources." Therefore, this article should not presume to invent a plural form for the species name, "Gampassas," when it could as easily be "Gampassa." These instances should be rewritten.
    • Done.
  • As we discussed, I'd like to see a ref note created to source the reptilian bit. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:39, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
    • Looking into that. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:32, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
      • Removed as I fail to find anything. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:51, February 20, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 09:43, February 21, 2014 (UTC)