Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Force harmony (second nomination)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Force harmony

Nominated by: Goodmind (talk) 18:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination comments:
WookieeProject (optional): WP:CO

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

UberSoldat

~~Last BTS paragraph should be eliminated, it's original research.~~
- Removed --Goodmind (talk) 17:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
~~Not sure what's going on with Ref 13, it's a relic of a bygone era.~~ UberSoldat93 (talk) 03:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Fixed --Goodmind (talk) 17:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Luca

~~Some paragraphs could use breaks.~~
- Which ones? --Goodmind (talk) 10:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
  - The second one in "Biography" and possibly the "Applications" one. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
    - I assume you meant "Description." Fixed. --Goodmind (talk) 08:23, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
~~Are there no additional images that can be added?~~
- Added --Goodmind (talk) 10:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
~~I've never seen {{C}} templates being used like that in "Sources," unless there is a policy or precendent that I'm unaware of, please remove them.~~
- Seeing as we forbid page and chapter references, doing the same for section references is only natural as well. UberSoldat93 (talk) 03:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Removed --Goodmind (talk) 10:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
~~Linking to articles' subsections should be avoided.~~
- Not sure that's possible here --Goodmind (talk) 10:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
  - Force sense/Legends has its own article. I'd say that, for the other two, you could link the Force power/Legends page once, and leave the other one without a link. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
    - Force sense would be a specific power, not an aspect, and just linking to the Force power page would be weird --Goodmind (talk) 08:20, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
      - Well, for several reasons, including the fact that sections headers' names can be changed at any time, we should avoid pipelinking to sections. I don't understand how "linking to the Force power page would be weird," to be honest. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 17:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
        I don't think these sections would be changed any time soon --Goodmind (talk) 13:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
        Imperators II created different pages for them. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 08:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
~~The "Area" information is infobox-exclusive.~~ LucaRoR ^(Talk) 05:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Fixed --Goodmind (talk) 10:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
  - They are now italicized in the body but not in the infobox. Which way is correct? LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
    - That seems to be how it's done on other Force power pages --Goodmind (talk) 08:20, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
      - Is there a satus precedent for this? I can't find it. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 17:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
        There are no status precedent for this, it's either infobox-exclusive or missing the Force power classification altogether ----Goodmind (talk) 13:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
        If the source italicizes them, then they should be italicized in both the body and the infobox, otherwise they shouldn't be italicized in either. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 08:05, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
        And Imp fixed this too. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 08:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Braha

Luke, Leia and Anakin Solo are lacking any proper context in the intro.
I think it would be better to namedrop Anakin Solo in the first reference to them in the body, rather that all the way at the end. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 09:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

Unaddressed objections far over ten days old, and nominator hasn't edited in nearly a month. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 14:20, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
UberSoldat93 (talk) 14:21, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
OOM 224 15:40, 21 August 2022 (UTC)