Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Felucia Medical Station HCTFF2

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Felucia Medical Station HCTFF2

  • Nominated by: Erebus Chronus (Talk) 20:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:TCW, WP:FFGAMES

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Good job. Please see if you're okay with my copy-edit, though. — Samonic Thrawns Chimaera (Talk) 08:54, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
  2. Cracking job. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 18:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
  3. ACvote UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 13:26, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
  4. ACvote OOM 224 16:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Nice! Imperators II(Talk) 15:41, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Object

OOM
  • "Felucian medical station" is just a descriptor; it's not a formal name, so it doesn't need to be specifically stated. This applies to the intro, Description, BTS, and Sources sections.
    • Well that's irritating, but fine.
  • "thus became involved in a skirmish on the surface against the pirate Hondo Ohnaka and his gang, who were attempting to raid Felucian farmers of their harvest of nysillin crops. Following their successes in repelling Ohnaka and his pirates" — This part isn't entirely relevant to the medical station. You can probably just shorten this to say that they had to repel Hondo Ohnaka's pirate gang without expanding on it any further. OOM 224 10:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Felucia Medical Station Imp2
  • In the ref note you mention that there were only twenty of those stations in service, which seems like a pretty significant thing given each Sector Army got just one, so I'd like to see you work that into the article text, as well. Imperators II(Talk) 13:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
    • How's that?
  • Per the article text, the station's name is always supposed to be used with the definite article, right? In that case, the few instances in the article where it's used without (reference notes, infobox) should be corrected, and that conjecturally-named event moved so that the name shows up correct in the infobox. Imperators II(Talk) 13:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 15:41, 13 May 2022 (UTC)