Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Conduit worm

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Conduit worm
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Conduit worm

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:01, September 21, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Aside from the fact that Ayrehead's research on stone mites uncovered some great Bts info on the creation of the conduit worm, this article has long exceeded the CA word cap. It's been spared the EC's wrath, so now it's time to make this a GA.

(3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Objections handled via IRC. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:05, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Fan26 (Talk) 22:34, October 20, 2019 (UTC)
  3. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:11, November 23, 2019 (UTC)
  4. Looks pretty much in order to me. --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 10:49, December 10, 2019 (UTC)
  5. UberSoldat93 (talk) 14:02, December 28, 2019 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:24, January 3, 2020 (UTC)
  7. ACvote Imperators II(Talk) 16:05, January 5, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • For starters, I'd say we could detail their skin and eye colors based on the image. This isn't in the article anywhere. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:05, November 5, 2019 (UTC)
    • I've eyeballed their skin color as gray, but you can always use an extra set of eyes on these sorts of things. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 07:33, November 6, 2019 (UTC)
      • Just say black for the eyes. We don't need to go into minute detail with real-world terminology. And there's obviously some brown going on there as well in the skin, no? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:16, December 19, 2019 (UTC)
        • Fixed. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 06:33, December 20, 2019 (UTC)
  • Does the source actually say they were "known to" sneak about ships (as in the Behavior) section?
    • Yes. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:59, January 3, 2020 (UTC)
  • As far as I can tell, "ergovore" and "ergovorous" are not real-world terms. I don't know if they were created for a Star Wars story or someone else just made them up for our category, but I don't think we should be applying this category to Canon subjects unless you can demonstrate this fictional term being used in that continuity. FWIW, I made a similar objection on a few other Canon noms for the likewise fictional Silicavorous creatures category name. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:57, December 29, 2019 (UTC)
    • Removed category. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:40, December 31, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 16:05, January 5, 2020 (UTC)