Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Cassander sector

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Cassander sector
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Erebus
        • 1.1.2.2 Macaroni
        • 1.1.2.3 Imp
        • 1.1.2.4 CC-8
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Cassander sector

  • Nominated by: DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:24, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: First GAN.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote Imperators II(Talk) 14:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
  2. I'm just going to pretend like I'm not jealous at how fast Imp reviewed :P JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH(Talk) 20:11, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Let me just reiterate that I've been expecting this nom for a long time. :P Imperators II(Talk) 21:48, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
  3. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 03:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  4. ACvote We need more of these. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 11:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Tommy-Macaroni 12:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Object

Erebus
  • Welcome to the GAN, Ruiz! First off, there are a few things I've noticed in the article so far:
    • In the first sentence of the second History paragraph, I believe you could put the part of the First Order being a successor to the Empire in between em dashes.
      • Added
    • Reading over History, it would be worth sub-sectioning some of the information, preferably around the third paragraph. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 04:20, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
      • Subsections created--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:40, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Macaroni

Per Erebus, good to see you here on the GAN.

  • I'm not convinced that the last sentence of the Bts is necessary, is there precedent for that? JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH(Talk) 23:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
    • BTS has been reworded by Imp.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Imp
  • Glad to see you finally wrote the Cassander sector up, Ruiz! OK, let's see...
  • If there are no other quotes available, please move the article's sole quote to the beginning of the intro.
    • Moved
  • Context for the Cobalt Scarab, please.
    • Added
  • In the articles for Mamkoda, Caraxl, and Sheh Soahi, you call them "astronomical objects," but in this article you refer to them as "worlds", which is a term which per precedent we reserve for planets by default. Imperators II(Talk) 17:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Changed to astronomical objects
  • "The Kalki Nebula was known to have hidden pirate bases" is this wording used in the source? If so, does it also say known to whom? Imperators II(Talk) 18:03, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Reworded--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
CC-8
  • First Order Space can be linked somewhere.
    • Added--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:32, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • What's the justification behind having so much info about a Legends discrepancy in the Bts? Commander Code-8 Hello There! 13:13, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
    • If I may interject here, the precedent has always to been to accurately describe a Canon subject's Legends origins in its article's BTS. The Legends Cassander sector just happens to have a relatively convoluted origin. Imperators II(Talk) 13:22, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
      • Guess I was just too tired when I first read it to follow that. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 03:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 12:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)