Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/CIS Jammer Prototype

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 CIS Jammer Prototype
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Uber
      • 1.1.3 Comments

CIS Jammer Prototype

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 15:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 18:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 386 words (84 introduction, 246 body, 56 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:CIS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote Fan26 (Talk) 14:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 01:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
  3. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 10:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
  4. ACvote LucaRoR Sigil of House Serenno (Talk) 20:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
  5. Lewisr (talk) 14:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Object

Uber
  • Do you believe there is enough info for the Separatist flotilla and Republic task force to get their own pages? UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 08:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
    • Sure. Imperators II(Talk) 10:46, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments

  • Was this ship recorded in the chronology in 36 ABY, or was 36 ABY when the chronology was published? Loqiical (talk) 10:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
    • The latter; I've rephrased it accordingly, thanks! Imperators II(Talk) 11:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)