Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Bombardment of Zarracina III

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Bombardment of Zarracina III

Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 14:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination comments:
Date Archived: 17:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Final word count: 374 words (114 introduction, 229 body, 31 behind the scenes)
Word count at nomination time: 372 words (113 introduction, 228 body, 31 behind the scenes)
WookieeProject (optional): WP:MD

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

How do we know this was published in 104 ABY? The title says that it was 352:10, but the article only covers history up to 104 ABY. I'm fine with not assuming that it was published in the 300s BBY, but I also think is an assumption to say it was published "in" 104 ABY, it could have been published a short time after that. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 12:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah so the funny thing about Tinker, Tailor is that the author confirmed in the endnotes that it was from 104 ABY, which means that the 352:10 figure isn't necessarily a date at all, at least not a Great ReSynchronization-based one. From the context it might actually be the number of that particular Byblos Journal issue instead. Imperators II^(Talk) 14:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
  - Makes sense, thanks for explaining it. However, the Hyperspace article itself doesn't really support a 104 ABY IU release date, so could you please reference O'Keefe's blog for the date on this article? ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 20:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
    - I'll have to disagree on the article itself not supporting it. After all, it is given as the latest date of the chronicle contained therein. The endnotes just confirm it is all. Imperators II^(Talk) 22:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)