Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Siege of the New Jedi Temple

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Siege of the New Jedi Temple

  • Nominated by: Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 03:49, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Some interesting stuff happens, that leads to some stuff happening that doesn't make much sense. Anyway, more FotJ/WP:LE, as usual.

(3 Inqs/4 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 17:29, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 00:46, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote 1358 (Talk) 23:40, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Daala's getting crazy. What will she do next? Oh, wait, she's already resigned.--ID-21 Dolphin DolphinJedi(Talk) 21:14, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:01, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
  6. ~SavageBOB sig 02:46, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
  7. Finally read it, good job, Jon. :) JangFett (Talk) 19:52, April 25, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Dolphiin
  • Just some minor nit-picky stuff. I think the quote templates should be turned into dialgoue ones, especially since they look like long quotes.
  • Also, in the infobox, "Mandalorian mercenaries" should be added to Side 2, and I think Kenth's name should go as a subset of "Jedi Council". Finally, in the aftermath section, mention that the Jedi were ultimately successful in their mission to get rid of Daala, since it's in the blurb for Conviction. Otherwise, great job!--ID-21 Dolphin DolphinJedi(Talk) 21:21, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
    • Firstly, the Mandalorian soldiers are already mentioned in side two. Secondly, I listed the Council separately since Kenth took actions that were completely unsanctioned by the High Council, thus acting as a sort of separate leader. Finally, there's absolutely no reason to put anything more in the aftermath as of yet regarding how successful the Jedi were in their mission to remove Daala until we know the exact circumstances from Conviction. It's not like the aftermath is skimpy and needs the information, and there's no reason we can't be patient; we don't want to accidentally put something misleading there. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 01:13, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
  • One final thought, even though I already voted for this: the "outcome" section could mention more stuff, especially "Jedi sentiment against Daala grows" or something along those lines.--ID-21 Dolphin DolphinJedi(Talk) 01:24, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
    • There is absolutely no reason to do so. The specific outcomes of the event are already listed appropriately. Read some other event FAs to see what typically belongs in that section. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 22:22, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Let's see linking on first mentions in the infobox, please. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:27, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
  • Perhaps this is nitpicky, but in the infobox, can we just say "Mandalorian Protectors," instead of the general "soldiers"? If they're definitely Protectors, we might as well state so outright.
  • I'm not sure I'm quite understanding this sentence. Led a manhunt of what? "Soon after the raid, Jedi Knight Turi Altamik also developed the psychosis and led a manhunt outside the Temple in full view of the media before she was finally captured by the Jedi." Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:03, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
    • As in after she fell prey to the psychosis there was a manhunt for her. I thought I could use it in that capacity, but if it doesn't work that way then I can reword it. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 23:18, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
      • I would recommend rewording it. It certainly reads to me like she was personally leading a manhunt for something. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:14, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Prepare to be savaged…
  • Should the article be tagged as having a conjectural title? ~SavageBOB sig 02:20, April 24, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 19:54, April 25, 2011 (UTC)