- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Nantex-class territorial defense starfighter
(8 Inqs/4 Users/12 Total)
Support
- As nominator--Goodwood
(For the Rebellion!) 02:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 
-- Darth Culator (Talk) 04:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)- —Graestan(This party's over) 03:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Imperialles 18:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)- Lord Hydronium 12:47, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Green Tentacle (Talk) 01:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Master Aban Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 21:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Impressive. Thefourdotelipsis 00:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Jaina Solo(Talk) 19:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Kilson LOVES PIE 18:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Not bad, considering how short it was. Unit 8311 17:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 00:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Oppose
Source the "Class" field of the infobox. And fix the quotation mark punctuation issues.--Imperialles 14:16, 28 November 2007 (UTC)- From the desk of Atarumaster88
Where is it stated that the warhead launchers are not canon? Given the modular nature of the weapons emplacements, I certainly don't see anything ruling their use out.- Never said they were non-canon, only on some variants (with inline citation).--Goodwood (For the Rebellion!) 14:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Meh, read that segment in the BTS incorrectly. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 14:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Meh, read that segment in the BTS incorrectly. Atarumaster88
- Never said they were non-canon, only on some variants (with inline citation).--Goodwood
No information from Clone Wars Chapter 4 or The Pengalan Standoff. Is there no new information here?- No appeareance in Pengalan Tradeoff so have struck it from the Appearances. Pending on Chapter 4 but my gut instinct is no.--Goodwood (For the Rebellion!) 14:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- No appearance in Chapter 4, however they are in Chapter 5. Added appropriate inline citation and appearance.--Goodwood (For the Rebellion!) 15:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Interestingly enough, both your citations for Chapters 2 and 5 cover the Battle of Muunilist. Is it supposed to be like that? Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 16:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- No, they're supposed to point out the Battle of Palpatine's Underpants and the Battle of Queen Amidala's Wardrobe. :-P --Goodwood (For the Rebellion!) 01:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Those sound like two of Anakin Skywalker's favorite games. Just curious, I didn't know both chapters covered the Battle of Muunilist. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 07:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Those sound like two of Anakin Skywalker's favorite games. Just curious, I didn't know both chapters covered the Battle of Muunilist. Atarumaster88
- No, they're supposed to point out the Battle of Palpatine's Underpants and the Battle of Queen Amidala's Wardrobe. :-P --Goodwood
- Interestingly enough, both your citations for Chapters 2 and 5 cover the Battle of Muunilist. Is it supposed to be like that? Atarumaster88
- No appearance in Chapter 4, however they are in Chapter 5. Added appropriate inline citation and appearance.--Goodwood
- No appeareance in Pengalan Tradeoff so have struck it from the Appearances. Pending on Chapter 4 but my gut instinct is no.--Goodwood
No information from the Clone Wars game. I've played that game, and their appearance could certainly use a mention.- Addressed.--Goodwood (For the Rebellion!) 14:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- That's a rather vague mention. I'm sure they were on Geonosis, but possibly also on Raxus Prime. Do some research, get the job done thoroughly. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 14:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Now that you mention it...I have played that game, and it's mostly ground-based vehicular combat with some levels played from an LAAT/i and two played on foot. Can't seem to remember encountering any beak-wings, not even on Geonosis itself. It's also not mentioned on the appearances list for the game's article.--Goodwood (For the Rebellion!) 15:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- The only way to be sure would be to re-check the game. Personally, I can't recall fighting them in combat, but for some reason "cut-scene" keeps popping up into my mind. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 16:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- If I add an {{C}appears in cutscenes}} would you be happy?--Goodwood (For the Rebellion!) 01:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Uh, not "cut scene". Sorry about that. "Cut-scene"- i.e. a video sequence, not a gameplay sequence. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 07:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- I still don't understand, but am still attempting to fix this very niggling little objection...can a guy get a break here? You wouldn't be doing this to, say, Lord Hydronium or Cull Tremayne.--Goodwood (For the Rebellion!) 13:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- First of all, I object fairly across the board. Second of all, if the material is present- and I think it is, in one of the video sequences in between the levels- then the material should be added. I could do it, but it'll be a couple weeks before I have my Gamecube and Clone Wars again. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 19:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- LordOblivion's been through all the cutscenes. No beak-wing starfighter.--Goodwood (For the Rebellion!) 21:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- LordOblivion's been through all the cutscenes. No beak-wing starfighter.--Goodwood
- First of all, I object fairly across the board. Second of all, if the material is present- and I think it is, in one of the video sequences in between the levels- then the material should be added. I could do it, but it'll be a couple weeks before I have my Gamecube and Clone Wars again. Atarumaster88
- I still don't understand, but am still attempting to fix this very niggling little objection...can a guy get a break here? You wouldn't be doing this to, say, Lord Hydronium or Cull Tremayne.--Goodwood
- Uh, not "cut scene". Sorry about that. "Cut-scene"- i.e. a video sequence, not a gameplay sequence. Atarumaster88
- If I add an {{C}appears in cutscenes}} would you be happy?--Goodwood
- The only way to be sure would be to re-check the game. Personally, I can't recall fighting them in combat, but for some reason "cut-scene" keeps popping up into my mind. Atarumaster88
- Now that you mention it...I have played that game, and it's mostly ground-based vehicular combat with some levels played from an LAAT/i and two played on foot. Can't seem to remember encountering any beak-wings, not even on Geonosis itself. It's also not mentioned on the appearances list for the game's article.--Goodwood
- That's a rather vague mention. I'm sure they were on Geonosis, but possibly also on Raxus Prime. Do some research, get the job done thoroughly. Atarumaster88
- Addressed.--Goodwood
"The campaign saw initial success for the Confederacy, but with the leadership of Jedi General Echuu Shen-Jon, the clone forces would ultimately triumph; this resulted in the death of Tann and the destruction of most of her forces". The part about Shen-Jon reads awkwardly. I suggest breaking it into two sentences.- Addressed.--Goodwood (For the Rebellion!) 14:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Addressed.--Goodwood
Last paragraph of BTS not very BTS-y. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 16:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)- Whatever that means...done my best to fix.--Goodwood (For the Rebellion!) 01:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry for the vague objection. The part about the export version is interesting speculation, but without any sourcing to back it up, it should probably go. The comment about the Ginivex seems irrelevant. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 07:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Removed the link to the fanblade. It's not really speculation as there is evidence, particularly from the included cartoon screenshot and from Anakin's quote. It's putting two and two together with the source available.--Goodwood (For the Rebellion!) 13:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Meh, whatever. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 19:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Meh, whatever. Atarumaster88
- Removed the link to the fanblade. It's not really speculation as there is evidence, particularly from the included cartoon screenshot and from Anakin's quote. It's putting two and two together with the source available.--Goodwood
- Sorry for the vague objection. The part about the export version is interesting speculation, but without any sourcing to back it up, it should probably go. The comment about the Ginivex seems irrelevant. Atarumaster88
- Whatever that means...done my best to fix.--Goodwood
- Have a Super Terrific Friendly Un-frustrating Day. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 04:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- The first image, on layman's resolution, is next to the infobox, causing the text to, well, "squish". It's not an objectionable point, obviously, but could it be moved down a scerrick? Thefourdotelipsis 00:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)